U.S. v. Hitchcock, 00-10251
| Decision Date | 26 September 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. CR-98-00716-ACK,No. 00-10251,00-10251,CR-98-00716-ACK |
| Parties | (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARK STEVEN HITCHCOCK, Defendant-Appellant. D.C. Filed |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Before: B. Fletcher, Canby, Jr., and Paez, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
We grant the government's motion to withdraw the panel decision in this case pending resolution of United States v. Buckland, 259 F.3d 1157, No. 99-30285. The government has consented to Hitchcock's interim release with appropriate restrictions.
We order the interim release of Hitchcock under appropriate restrictions to be set by the district court.
We remand to the district court for that limited purpose.
We direct that the unpublished order filed September 26, 2001 withdrawing our opinion be re-filed as a published order.
To continue reading
Request your trial
41 cases
-
U.S. v. Lopez
... ... REINHARDT, Circuit Judge ... The issue before us is whether a driver who transports a group of illegal aliens from a drop-off point in the United ... ...
- State v. Douglas C.
-
U.S. v. Walker, 05-16756.
... ... 490 F.3d 1294 ... whether a proffered reason was pretextual. The record does not always show us definitively what the district court saw and heard. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 339, 123 ... ...
- United States v. Mancuso
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Motion practice
...court to instruct the jury that it must be unanimous as to which offense the defendant committed. [ United States v. Ramirez-Martinez , 273 F.3d 903, 915 (9th Cir. 2001).] Form: • Form 15-3 Duplicity Motion §15:31 Multiplicity Multiplicity is charging a single offense in multiple counts of ......