U.S. v. Hollywood Marine, Inc., 80-1647
| Decision Date | 25 August 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 80-1647,80-1647 |
| Citation | 625 F.2d 524 |
| Parties | , 10 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,718 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLLYWOOD MARINE, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. . Unit A |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Allen van Emmerik, Thomas W. Snook, Civil Div., Torts Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.
Brown, Sims & Ayre, Ronald L. White, Houston, Tex., for Hollywood Marine, Inc. & Water Quality Ins. Syndicate.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Before BROWN, POLITZ, and TATE, Circuit Judges.
The appellant, the United States, seeks summary reversal of the lower court judgment disallowing any recovery for the costs of the clean-up of an oil spill from the appellee, Hollywood Marine. The United States bases its motion on a recent opinion by this court, United States v. LeBeouf Bros. Towing Co., 621 F.2d 787 (5th Cir. 1980), which reversed a district court decision relied upon by the court below in the instant case. LeBeouf, which is factually similar to the case under consideration, involved the interpretation of a section of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(f) (1). The Fifth Circuit found that, under that section, a tug will not be considered a "third party" in order to allow the owner of a discharging vessel to avoid liability for an oil spill occurring while the vessel is in the tow of the tug.
The reversal of the district court opinion in LeBeouf, relied upon below, makes appropriate our grant of an order for summary reversal and remand. Thus, the expense of filing the record and the briefs in a case that would necessarily be reversed by this court on a hearing on the merits is avoided.
Hollywood Marine, appellee, properly points out to this court that a rehearing will be applied for in the LeBeouf decision, as a consequence of which (or of Supreme Court review) the initial LeBeouf ruling may be changed. However, should rehearing be granted in this court in LeBeouf, Hollywood's position will be adequately protected by its timely application for rehearing; for then ruling upon this application and issuance of mandate will be withheld until final action on LeBeouf in this court.
Accordingly, we GRANT the appellant's motion to reverse the judgment and to remand this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas for further proceedings in...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp.
...697 F.2d 288 (2d Cir.1983); United States v. Hollywood Marine, Inc., 519 F.Supp. 688, 692 (S.D.Tex. 1981), rev'd on other grounds, 625 F.2d 524 (5th Cir.1980). In fact, the pertinent language of the two statutes addressing liability and contribution is strikingly similar. Compare 33 U.S.C. ......
-
U.S. v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.
...Inc., No. 77-1870 (S.D.Tex. May 3, 1979); United States v. Hollywood Marine, Inc., 487 F.Supp. 1211 (S.D.Tex.1979), reversed, 625 F.2d 524 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. M/V Big Sam, 480 F.Supp. 290 (E.D.La.1979), vacating 454 F.Supp. 1144 (E.D.La.1978); In re Oswego Barge Corp., 1979 A.......
-
Hollywood Marine, Inc v. United States, 80-1160
...under § 1321(f)(1). The District Court sustained the defense, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed. 625 F.2d 524 (1980). The Court of Appeals relied on its earlier decision in United States v. LeBeouf Brothers Towing Co., 621 F.2d 787, rehearing denied, 629 ......