U.S. v. Johnson
Decision Date | 16 December 2005 |
Docket Number | No. CR 01-3046-MWB.,CR 01-3046-MWB. |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Angela JOHNSON, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa |
Alfred E. Willett, Terpstra, Epping & Willett, Cedar Rapids, IA, Dean A. Stowers, Rosenberg, Stowers & Morse, Robert R. Rigg, Des Moines, IA, Patrick J. Berrigan, Watson & Dameron, LLP, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS IN ARREST OF JUDGMENT AND FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL OR NEW TRIAL
To continue reading
Request your trial26 cases
-
U.S. v. Brandao
...defendants did not object to the jury instruction at trial, the instruction is reviewed for plain error."); United States v. Johnson, 403 F.Supp.2d 721, 831 (N.D.Iowa 2005) (noting that "when no timely objection is made to preserve the error in the instructions, the reviewing court will rev......
-
United States v. Johnson
...See United States v. Johnson, 362 F. Supp. 2d 1043, 1099-1111 (N.D. Iowa 2005) (quoting 21 U.S.C. § 848(k)).United States v. Johnson, 403 F. Supp. 2d 721, 747 (N.D. Iowa 2005). Johnson is correct that, in my ruling on her § 2255 Motion, I did not grant any relief from the original jury's ve......
-
United States v. Johnson
...children. Nevertheless, even that appearance of “arbitrariness” does not reach constitutional proportions. See United States v. Johnson, 403 F.Supp.2d 721, 736 (N.D.Iowa 2005) (denying Johnson's post-trial notices, but noting the defendant's argument about the unfairness of the different se......
-
United States v. Johnson
...” See United States v. Johnson, 362 F.Supp.2d 1043, 1099–1111 (N.D.Iowa 2005) (quoting 21 U.S.C. § 848(k)).United States v. Johnson, 403 F.Supp.2d 721, 747 (N.D.Iowa 2005). Johnson is correct that, in my ruling on her § 2255 Motion, I did not grant any relief from the original jury's verdic......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 23 - § 23.4 THE "AUDIENCES" OF ANY COURTROOM TECHNOLOGY PRESENTATION
...available at www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonWilliamJMartinez.aspx. [30] United States v. Johnson, 403 F. Supp. 2d 721, 866 n. 25 (N.D. Iowa 2005).[31] See Littler, supra n. 11, at 30, 34. [32] Fanelli v. Centenary Coll., 211 F.R.D. 268, 271 (D.N.J. 2002).[33......
-
Chapter 23 - § 23.3 • THE "AUDIENCES" OF ANY COURTROOM TECHNOLOGY PRESENTATION
...United States v. Johnson, 403 F. Supp. 2d 721, 866 (N.D. Iowa 2005).[26] See Littler, supra n. 11, at 30, 34.[27] Fanelli v. Centenary Coll., 211 F.R.D. 268, 271 (D.N.J. 2002).[28] Id.[29] See, e.g., Forte Supply, LLC v. Mojo Frozen Yogurt, LLC, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140688, at *13-14 (D. C......