U.S. v. Kemner, 78-1697

Decision Date25 August 1978
Docket NumberNo. 78-1697,78-1697
Citation578 F.2d 1165
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Richard KEMNER, Defendant-Appellant. Summary Calendar. *
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Roland E. Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, Karen K. Brown, Gustavo L. Acevedo, Asst. Federal Public Defenders, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

J. A. Canales, U. S. Atty., John M. Potter, George A. Kelt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., Robert A. Berg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Corpus Christi, Tex., James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before THORNBERRY, GEE and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, sentenced on October 28, 1977, filed his Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence on March 7, 1978 130 days after sentence was imposed. That rule permits a sentencing judge to reconsider a sentence "within 120 days after the sentence is imposed . . . ." Whatever latitude may exist for consideration by the judge after this period of motions filed within it, the judge is without jurisdiction to consider motions not filed within it. United States v. Flores, 507 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1975).

Appellant's motion was for this reason correctly denied.

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • United States v. Cotton, 83-CR-17.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • 28 Noviembre 1983
    ...any circumstances, be extended to enlarge the time in which the defendant may move for a reduction of sentence. United States v. Kemner, 578 F.2d 1165, 1166 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Estela, 58 F.R.D. 210, 211 (D.P.R. 1972). Indeed, if the motion is untimely filed and the sentence is......
  • U.S. v. Mariano, s. 80-2047
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 26 Febrero 1981
    ...generally have adopted a strict reading of Rule 35, see United States v. Lanier, 604 F.2d 1157 (8th Cir. 1979); United States v. Kemner, 578 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1978), considering the 120 day limit as jurisdictional. Nonetheless, occasional departures from a narrow construction of the time ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT