U.S. v. Kirby, 88-5869
| Decision Date | 16 January 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-5869,88-5869 |
| Citation | 893 F.2d 867 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tracy L. KIRBY, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Joseph M. Whittle, U.S. Atty., Randy W. Ream, Asst. U.S. Atty., Terry Cushing (argued), David P. Grise, Asst. U.S. Atty., Louisville, Ky., for plaintiff-appellee.
Thomas F. Chimera (argued), Bowling Green, Ky., for defendant-appellant.
Before RYAN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and TURNER, District Judge. *
The question raised by this appeal is whether the fact that defendant had been adjudicated delinquent as a minor under Kentucky law and committed to a state agency charged with the custody of delinquent juveniles could be considered in determining his criminal history category under the federal sentencing guidelines.
Defendant entered a plea of guilty to a charge of breaking into a post office, brought under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2115. The sentencing judge was advised that defendant, when seventeen years of age, had been adjudicated delinquent by a Kentucky juvenile court on the basis of conduct that would constitute burglary, theft, and other related crimes, and was committed to the custody of the Kentucky Cabinet for Human Resources until he attained the age of eighteen, a period of nearly seven months.
In addressing defendant's criminal history under the sentencing guidelines, the court added two points for a "prior sentence of imprisonment" of at least sixty days, as directed by section 4A1.1(b), and another two points under section 4A1.1(e), since the federal offense was committed less than two years after defendant's release from imprisonment on the sentence counted under section 4A1.1(b). Citing guideline section 4A1.2(a)(1), which defines a "prior sentence" in the context of an "adjudication of guilt," and section 4A1.2(b)(1), which defines "sentence of imprisonment" as involving "incarceration," defendant complains that, since under Kentucky law an adjudication of delinquency by a juvenile court cannot be deemed a conviction, his juvenile record cannot be recognized to enchance his sentence under the guidelines.
Federal law, not Kentucky law, controls sentencing disposition in the event of convictions for federal offenses. See Dickerson v. New Banner Institute Inc., 460 U.S. 103, 111-12, 103 S.Ct. 986, 991-92, 74 L.Ed.2d 845 (1983); Flippins v. United States, 808 F.2d 16, 19 (6th Cir.1987). Guideline section 4A1.2(d)(2)(A), in providing instructions for computing criminal history as it relates to offenses...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
US v. Nelson, Cr. A. No. 89-20081-01.
...prior adjudications of juvenile delinquency under state law in determining criminal history score); United States v. Kirby, 893 F.2d 867, 868 (6th Cir.1990) (per curiam) (defendant's prior juvenile convictions may be considered for sentencing purposes); United States v. Williams, 891 F.2d 2......
-
U.S. v. Jones
...Indeed, we have explicitly applied the Supreme Court's pronouncements in Dickerson to federal sentencing issues. See United States v. Kirby, 893 F.2d 867, 868 (6th Cir.1990) ("Federal law, not Kentucky law, controls sentencing disposition in the event of convictions for federal offenses.") ......
-
United States v. Nieto
...1095 (quoting U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(d)(2)(A), and citing United States v. Fuentes, 991 F.2d 700, 702 (11th Cir. 1993) ; United States v. Kirby, 893 F.2d 867, 868 (6th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 945 (1990)). The Tenth Circuit noted that, as in United States v. Birch, the Sixth and Elevent......
-
People v. Peterson, B090670
... ... v. Bucaro (3rd Cir.1990) 898 F.2d 368, 371-373; U.S. v. Kirby (6th Cir.1990) 893 F.2d 867, 868; State v. Little (Minn.App.1988) 423 N.W.2d 722.) Neither are ... 3 ... The final factor which convinces us of the correctness of our construction of Proposition 184 is this: interpreting the statute ... ...