U.S. v. Koblan
| Decision Date | 15 February 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 05-13038.,05-13038. |
| Citation | 478 F.3d 1324 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael A. KOBLAN, Jr., a.k.a. Big Mike, a.k.a. Mike Kerry, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
Randee Jill Golder (Court-Appointed), Randee J. Golder, P.A., Boynton Beach, FL, for Koblan.
Stephen Schlessinger, Anne R. Schultz, Asst. U.S. Atty., Harriett R. Galvin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, FL, for U.S.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and BOWMAN,* Circuit Judges.
After review, the Court grants the motion filed by defendant Michael Koblan's counsel to dismiss this appeal as moot because the defendant died in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons while his appeal remained pending before this Court. The Court remands the case to the district court to vacate the judgment and dismiss the indictment. See United States v. Logal, 106 F.3d 1547, 1552 (11th Cir.1997); United States v. Schumann, 861 F.2d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir.1988); United States v. Romano, 755 F.2d 1401, 1402 (11th Cir. 1985).
We recognize that the government opposes the motion, stressing that all briefs have been filed, oral argument has been held, and nothing remains but the issuance of this Court's opinion. The government points out that the defendant was convicted of murder, the defendant's sentence contains an order of restitution in the amount of $274,336 to be paid to the murder victims' family, and that granting the motion, especially as to restitution, grants a windfall to the defendant.
The problem for the government is that our binding precedent cited above requires that we grant the relief requested by defendant's counsel. In United States v. Romano, this Court stated that "[w]hen a defendant dies pending direct appeal of his criminal conviction, the Court will dismiss the appeal as moot with respect to that defendant and remand the case to the district court to vacate the judgment and dismiss the indictment." 755 F.2d at 1402. In United States v. Schumann, we also said that "[i]t is a well-settled principle of law that all criminal proceedings abate ab initio when the defendant dies pending direct appeal of his criminal conviction." 861 F.2d at 1236. In United States v. Logal, where there was a restitution order and the defendant committed suicide, this Court rejected the windfall argument, stating:
Concerning the argument that the heirs of [defendant] Kuczek's estate may receive a windfall, nothing precludes the victims from bringing a separate civil action to prevent any improper benefit to Kuczek's estate. Accordingly, we grant Kuczek's motion requesting that we vacate his conviction and sentence, remand the case to the district court, and instruct the district court to dismiss the indictment.
We recognize that there is a circuit split on this issue. Compare Logal, 106 F.3d at 1552, with United States v. Christopher, 273 F.3d 294, 299 (3d Cir.2001) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Iriele, No. 17-13455
...remanding that part for the district court to vacate her convictions and dismiss the indictment as to her. See United States v. Koblan, 478 F.3d 1324, 1325 (11th Cir. 2007). Our order provided that the appeal would "continue unabated" as to Iriele, and so it has. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUNDA. The......
-
Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter v. Machen
... ... He wants to sift this group like wheat and is roaming on [ ] campus like a roaring lion waiting for the chance to destroy us. If the devil sifts our group, he will probably do it primarily through alcohol, but also through sexual impurity or lust, pride, laziness, and ... This is so even if, as here, the court has heard oral argument and has taken the case under advisement. See United States v. Koblan, 478 F.3d 1324, 1326 (11th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (dismissing the appeal as moot despite the fact that "all briefs have been filed, oral argument ... ...
-
Chestnut v. Merrill
...nothing remains but the issuance of this Court's opinion," or, as in this case, after testimony has been heard. United States v. Koblan , 478 F.3d 1324, 1325 (11th Cir. 2007). A case becomes moot when the issues "are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the ......
-
United States v. Coddington
...v. Volpendesto, 755 F.3d 448, 452 (7th Cir. 2014); United States v. Rich, 603 F.3d 722, 728-29 (9th Cir. 2010); United States v. Koblan, 478 F.3d 1324, 1325-26 (11th Cir. 2007). Three federal circuit courts did not abate a criminal restitution order under the abatement ab initio doctrine. S......
-
Appellate Practice and Procedure - Robert G. Boliek, Jr.
...Ethredge v. Hail, 996 F.2d 1173, 1175 (11th Cir. 1993)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 51. See, e.g., United States v. Koblan, 478 F.3d 1324, 1325 (11th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (holding that the death of a criminal defendant mooted the appeal and required the judgment of conviction to ......