U.S. v. Lace, Nos. 1560

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
Writing for the CourtBefore VAN GRAAFEILAND and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges, and DUMBAULD; VAN GRAAFEILAND; Holden's; NEWMAN
Citation669 F.2d 46
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David T. LACE, Roger R. Ducharme, Gary D. Butts, Patricia Eckman, and Glenn Pollack, Defendants-Appellants. ockets 81-1098, 1099, 1102, 1100, 1103.
Decision Date05 January 1982
Docket NumberNos. 1560,1563,1562,1542,D,1561
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
73 practice notes
  • State v. Madera
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • December 17, 1985
    ...limited to significant issues the determination of which on appeal is likely to be dispositive of the case. See United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46, 53 n. 5 (2d Cir.1982) (Newman, J., concurring). For this reason, the recent federal rule provides that the reserved issues must be specified in......
  • Hart v. Myers, No. 3:97CV2574(SRU).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • January 23, 2002
    ..."exigent circumstances or some other exception." United States v. Gori, 230 F.3d 44, 50 (2d Cir.2000); see also United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46, 56 (2d Cir.1982) ("absent exigent circumstances a warrantless search of one's home or its curtilage, when effected through trespass, violates t......
  • State v. Costin, No. 96-624.
    • United States
    • Vermont United States State Supreme Court of Vermont
    • July 31, 1998
    ...for concluding that one has waived all right to privacy from intrusive government surveillance on that land, see United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46, 55 (2d Cir.1982) (Newman, J., concurring) ("open fields" on private property are not open for any surveillance police officers choose to condu......
  • US v. Evans, No. 86 Crim. 384 (LBS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • July 10, 1987
    ...that probable cause did not exist without it, suppression not required); United States v. Lace, 502 F.Supp. 1021, 1039 (D.Vt.), aff'd, 669 F.2d 46 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 854, 103 S.Ct. 121, 74 L.Ed.2d 106 (1982). We find that the search performed in Bermuda played no part in the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
74 cases
  • US v. Gambino, No. 6th "S" 88 Cr. 919 (PKL).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • April 19, 1990
    ...829 F.2d 1225, 1231 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1237, 108 S.Ct. 2907, 101 L.Ed.2d 939 (1988) (citing United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46, 49 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 854, 103 S.Ct. 121, 74 L.Ed.2d 106 2. Factual Dispute The affidavit of Special Agent John G. Nemec, Jr. is ......
  • State v. Madera
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • December 17, 1985
    ...limited to significant issues the determination of which on appeal is likely to be dispositive of the case. See United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46, 53 n. 5 (2d Cir.1982) (Newman, J., concurring). For this reason, the recent federal rule provides that the reserved issues must be specified in......
  • Hart v. Myers, No. 3:97CV2574(SRU).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • January 23, 2002
    ..."exigent circumstances or some other exception." United States v. Gori, 230 F.3d 44, 50 (2d Cir.2000); see also United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46, 56 (2d Cir.1982) ("absent exigent circumstances a warrantless search of one's home or its curtilage, when effected through trespass, violates t......
  • State v. Costin, No. 96-624.
    • United States
    • Vermont United States State Supreme Court of Vermont
    • July 31, 1998
    ...for concluding that one has waived all right to privacy from intrusive government surveillance on that land, see United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46, 55 (2d Cir.1982) (Newman, J., concurring) ("open fields" on private property are not open for any surveillance police officers choose to condu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT