U.S. v. Lanier
| Decision Date | 13 May 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 93-5608,93-5608 |
| Citation | 114 F.3d 84 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David W. LANIER, Defendant-Appellant |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Prior report: 6th Cir., 73 F.3d 1380.
Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, JONES, WELLFORD, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges.
In light of the United States Supreme Court's judgment of April 30, 1997, this case will be reheard en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and the case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, June 16, 1997, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Wednesday, July 16, 1997. The Clerk will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Sabino v. Reno
-
Olvera v. Reno
... ... The BIA concluded that "[i]n light of this statement of congressional intent, it cannot be said that the statute permits us to continue to apply our prior case law to deportable aliens within the scope of section 440(d) in disregard of its unambiguous mandate." While the ... ...
- Homayun v. Cravener
-
U.S. v. Torres
... ... In order to address Torres's challenge, it is necessary for us to briefly rehearse the recent history of the immigration laws ... The 1952 INA contained a provision excluding from the United ... ...