U.S. v. LaRoche, 95-3415
| Decision Date | 13 May 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 95-3415,95-3415 |
| Citation | 83 F.3d 958 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lawrence Fay LaROCHE, Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Stanley E. Whiting, Winner, SD, argued, for appellant.
Michelle Tapken, Sioux Falls, SD, argued, for Appellee.
Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
Lawrence Fay LaRoche appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 2241(c). For reversal, LaRoche argues the district court erred by relying on "contested" facts in the presentence report (PSR) as the basis for assessing the use-of-force enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1(b)(1). We affirm.
LaRoche's PSR recommended a four-level increase under section 2A3.1(b)(1) because he used force and threats to commit the instant offense. LaRoche objected to the recommended enhancement, and to the factual statements contained in paragraphs four and five of the PSR. At sentencing, the district, relying on the unchallenged factual allegations contained in paragraphs six, seven, and ten of LaRoche's PSR, found that LaRoche had used force and threats to commit the instant offense, and overruled LaRoche's objection. 2 The district court sentenced LaRoche to 235 months imprisonment and five years supervised release.
Section 2A3.1(b)(1) states that "[i]f the offense was committed by the means set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a) or (b) ... increase by 4 levels." Section 2241(a) includes the act of causing another person to engage in a sexual act by using force against that person, see 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a)(1), or by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will be subject to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping, see 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a)(2).
A district court may accept as true all factual allegations contained in the PSR that are not specifically objected to by the parties. United States v. Montanye, 996 F.2d 190, 192-93 (8th Cir.1993) (en banc). Because LaRoche did not specifically object to the factual allegations contained in paragraphs six, seven, and ten of the PSR, we conclude the district court did not err by relying on those paragraphs in assessing the challenged enhancement. See United States v. Beatty, 9 F.3d 686, 690-91 (8th Cir.1993). Moreover, we conclude the district court did not clearly err in assessing the use-of-force enhancement. See United States v. Saknikent, 30 F.3d 1012, 1013 (8th Cir.1994) (standard of review). The uncontested facts show that LaRoche forced the victim to perform various sexual acts, that he threatened her with retaliation if she told anyone about the abuse, and that the victim feared retaliation by LaRoche. Cf. United States...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Flores
...as true for purposes of sentencing.") (citing United States v. Moser, 168 F.3d 1130, 1132 (8th Cir.1999)); United States v. LaRoche, 83 F.3d 958, 959 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam) ("A district court may accept as true all factual allegations contained in the PSR that are not specifically obje......
-
U.S. v. Piggie, 01-3170.
...The District Court therefore was entitled to accept as true the allegations in the PSR regarding this weapon. See United States v. LaRoche, 83 F.3d 958, 959 (8th Cir.1996) (holding that "[a] district court may accept as true all factual allegations contained in the PSR that are not specific......
-
U.S. v. McFarland
...in his presentence report (PSR), and so the district court could have relied directly on the PSR. See United States v. LaRoche, 83 F.3d 958, 959 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam). Finally, McFarland's challenge to the four-level increase of his offense level for organizing or leading a criminal a......
-
U.S. v. Johnson
...States v. Willie, 253 F.3d 1215, 1220 (10th Cir. 2001); United States v. Lucas, 157 F.3d 998, 1002 (5th Cir.1998); United States v. LaRoche, 83 F.3d 958, 959 (8th Cir.1996). An offender's ability to commit forcible rape without resort to physical restraint leads us to conclude that unlawful......