U.S. v. Lee, No. 80-1336
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before ELY, SCHROEDER and FLETCHER; ELY |
| Citation | 648 F.2d 667 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Daulton LEE, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Docket Number | No. 80-1336 |
| Decision Date | 18 June 1981 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
U.S. v. Hernandez-Escarsega, HERNANDEZ-ESCARSEG
...Page 1582 not infer bias simply on the basis of the judge's exposure to potentially inflammatory information. In United States v. Lee, 648 F.2d 667, 669 (9th Cir.1981), the appellant argued that the trial court's in camera exposure to "volatile and inflammatory" documents must necessarily h......
-
State v. Head, No. 23404
...to the sound discretion of the district court and is not reviewable on appeal except for an abuse of discretion. See U.S. v. Lee, 648 F.2d 667, 668 n. 1 (9th Cir.1981); U.S. v. Niemiec, 689 F.2d 688, 692 (7th Cir.1982). The abuse of discretion standard on Rule 35 motions continues the defer......
-
U.S. v. Gonzales, Nos. 84-3071
...because if we do not do so, we will have abandoned our reliance on the good faith of our district court judges. See United States v. Lee, 648 F.2d 667, 669 (9th Cir.1981) (mere awareness of prejudicial information by trial judge does not taint sentence if not relied on). As we stated in Far......
-
U.S. v. Hitow, Nos. 88-1970
...information by a trial judge does not taint the sentence if the information was not expressly relied on. See United States v. Lee, 648 F.2d 667, 669 (9th Cir.1981). In spite of the district court's statement concerning the different backgrounds of Canter and Hitow with regard to involvement......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
U.S. v. Hernandez-Escarsega, HERNANDEZ-ESCARSEG
...Page 1582 not infer bias simply on the basis of the judge's exposure to potentially inflammatory information. In United States v. Lee, 648 F.2d 667, 669 (9th Cir.1981), the appellant argued that the trial court's in camera exposure to "volatile and inflammatory" documents must necessarily h......
-
State v. Head, No. 23404
...to the sound discretion of the district court and is not reviewable on appeal except for an abuse of discretion. See U.S. v. Lee, 648 F.2d 667, 668 n. 1 (9th Cir.1981); U.S. v. Niemiec, 689 F.2d 688, 692 (7th Cir.1982). The abuse of discretion standard on Rule 35 motions continues the defer......
-
U.S. v. Gonzales, Nos. 84-3071
...because if we do not do so, we will have abandoned our reliance on the good faith of our district court judges. See United States v. Lee, 648 F.2d 667, 669 (9th Cir.1981) (mere awareness of prejudicial information by trial judge does not taint sentence if not relied on). As we stated in Far......
-
U.S. v. Hitow, Nos. 88-1970
...information by a trial judge does not taint the sentence if the information was not expressly relied on. See United States v. Lee, 648 F.2d 667, 669 (9th Cir.1981). In spite of the district court's statement concerning the different backgrounds of Canter and Hitow with regard to involvement......
Request a trial to view additional results