U.S. v. Lynch

• Decision Date: 13 March 2003
• Docket Number: No. 02-3250.,02-3250.
• Citation: 322 F.3d 1016
• Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David LYNCH, Appellant.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

322 F.3d 1016

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David LYNCH, Appellant.

No. 02-3250.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 12, 2003.

Filed: March 13, 2003.

John J. Bishop, Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellant.

Teresa K. Baumann, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellee.

Before BOWMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

David Lynch entered a conditional guilty plea to conspiracy to manufacture and distribute more than fifty grams of methamphetamine, to the manufacture and distribution of more than fifty grams of methamphetamine, as well as to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Lynch reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress and, on appeal, urges that the District Court¹ erred when it determined that the scope of the search warrant was adequately supported by probable cause. When considering a district court's denial of a motion to suppress, we review the court's factual determinations for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo. United States v. Ervasti, 201 F.3d 1029, 1038 (8th Cir.2000). We affirm.

Lynch contends that the search warrant was over-broad and that the required "nexus between the contraband and the place to be searched" was absent. United States v. Tellez, 217 F.3d 547, 550 (8th Cir.2000). Rather, he argues, the facts only supported the issuance of a warrant for the search of the outbuildings on his property and not his residence, where the evidence sought to be suppressed was found. We disagree. The information presented in the application for the search warrant and in Officer Furness's accompanying affidavit clearly establish probable cause for the search of the entire property. See Application for Search Warrant at 6-8. The affidavit recites that the police observed two suspected drug dealers (Delwin Troy Thompson, Jr. and Lynch) arrive in an automobile at Lynch's property and enter Lynch's residence. The two men left the residence shortly thereafter and Thompson was observed carrying two small items, which he placed into the front of his car. Lynch then walked behind one of the outbuildings and returned carrying a large bucket, which he placed into a storage box that he took from his own car. He then placed the storage box into Thompson's trunk. After Thompson left the Lynch property, police stopped him (after a brief chase) because his license was suspended and searched his car. They found two packages of lithium batteries and what they suspected (and Thompson stated) was anhydrous ammonia in the storage box in his trunk (lithium and anhydrous ammonia are precursors to methamphetamine). This alone would support the issuance of a warrant to search the entire property; however, there was more.

Furness's...