U.S. v. McManigal, 82-1754
| Decision Date | 20 December 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-1754,82-1754 |
| Citation | 723 F.2d 580 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald P. McMANIGAL, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 81 CR 764 Joel M. Flaum, Judge.
On Remand from the Supreme Court. 1
Before CUMMINGS, Chief Judge, HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge, and WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Senior District Judge *.
On consideration of the parties' Circuit Rule 19 statements, filed this month in the light of Russello v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 296, 78 L.Ed.2d 17 (1983), our judgment of May 19, 1983 (see 708 F.2d 276) is vacated insofar as it holds that "any interest" in forfeiture section of racketeering statute (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1963(a)(1) does not include proceeds derived from a pattern of racketeering activity (708 F.2d at 283-287) but is reaffirmed insofar as it holds that the United States can only recover whatever accounts receivable were still in existence at time of defendant's conviction (708 F.2d at 287-290). 2 Therefore the district court's order forfeiting $99,700 to the United States remains reversed.
1 See --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 419, 78 L.Ed.2d ----.
* The Honorable Walter E. Hoffman, Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, is sitting by designation.
2 This question was left open in Russello. --- U.S. at ---- n. 3, 104 S.Ct. at 304 n. 3.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Rogers
...seizure. See United States v. McManigal, 708 F.2d 276, 287-90, vacated, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 419, 78 L.Ed.2d 355 on remand, 723 F.2d 580 (7th Cir.1983). This interpretation of the statute is inconsistent with Congress' broadly defined legislative purpose as recognized in both Russello an......
-
United States v. Ianniello
...than the prior law.") 87 708 F.2d 276 (7th Cir.), vacated, 464 U.S. 979, 104 S.Ct. 419, 78 L.Ed.2d 355, re-aff'd on remand, 723 F.2d 580 (7th Cir.1983). 88 McManigal was vacated by the Supreme Court and remanded for reconsideration in light of the Court's decision in Russello v. United Stat......
-
United States v. Richter
...United States v. McManigal, 708 F.2d 276 (7th Cir.1983), vacated, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 419, 78 L.Ed.2d 355 (1983), aff'd on remand, 723 F.2d 580 (1983); cf. United States v. George, 477 F.2d 508 (7th Cir. 1973) (non-fiduciary of corporation guilty for scheming with employee who did owe f......
-
US v. Vogt
...Cir.1980); United States v. McManigal, 708 F.2d 276 (7th Cir.), vacated, 464 U.S. 979, 104 S.Ct. 419, 78 L.Ed.2d 355 modified, 723 F.2d 580 (7th Cir.1983); United States v. Thevis, 474 F.Supp. 117 (N.D.Ga.1979), aff'd, 665 F.2d 616 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008, 102 S.Ct. 2300, 73......
-
Defending the Federal Drug or Racketeering Charge
...16 (1983). 17. United States v. Lizza Industries, 775 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1985), cert, den., 106 S.Ct. 1459. 18. United States v. McManigal, 723 F.2d 580 (7th Cir. 1983) overruled United States v. Ginsburg, 773 F.2d 798 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. den., 106 S.Ct. 1186. 19. 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. ......