U.S. v. Mornan, No. 04-1319.

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
Writing for the CourtVan Antwerpen
Citation413 F.3d 372
PartiesUNITED STATES of America v. Christopher MORNAN, Appellant.
Docket NumberNo. 04-1319.
Decision Date30 June 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
45 practice notes
  • U.S. v. Root, No. 08-2888.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • 29 Octubre 2009
    ...the facts in the light most favorable to the Government because the jury found Root guilty of both charges. United States v. Mornan, 413 F.3d 372, 382 (3d A former attorney, Root began working in the mid-1990s as special projects director at Reading Broadcasting, Inc. (RBI), an independent ......
  • U.S. v. Walker, Nos. 10–3090
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • 13 Septiembre 2011
    ...knowledge’ if it ‘will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.’ ” United States v. Mornan, 413 F.3d 372, 380 (3d Cir.2005) (quoting Fed.R.Evid. 702). Under Rule 702, a witness may qualify as an expert if three requirements are satisfied: “(1) the......
  • U.S. v. Miller, No. 06-5187.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • 2 Junio 2008
    ...it is not preserved "by making a timely motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence." United States v. Mornan, 413 F.3d 372, 381 (3d Cir.2005) (citing United States v. Wolfe, 245 F.3d 257, 260-61 (3d Cir.2001), and United States v. Gaydos, 108 F.3d 505, 509 (3d C......
  • United States v. Mangum, 5:16-CR-12-D-6
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Eastern District of North Carolina
    • 9 Junio 2020
    ...feigns ignorance of his grand jury testimony, or a witness who manifests his reluctance to testify at trial. See United States v. Mornan, 413 F.3d 372, 379 (3d Cir. 2005) (collecting cases); DiCaro, 772 F.2d at 1317–18, 1321–25.As for Howell's grand jury testimony, Howell physically resiste......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
45 cases
  • U.S. v. Root, No. 08-2888.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • 29 Octubre 2009
    ...the facts in the light most favorable to the Government because the jury found Root guilty of both charges. United States v. Mornan, 413 F.3d 372, 382 (3d A former attorney, Root began working in the mid-1990s as special projects director at Reading Broadcasting, Inc. (RBI), an independent ......
  • U.S. v. Walker, Nos. 10–3090
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • 13 Septiembre 2011
    ...knowledge’ if it ‘will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.’ ” United States v. Mornan, 413 F.3d 372, 380 (3d Cir.2005) (quoting Fed.R.Evid. 702). Under Rule 702, a witness may qualify as an expert if three requirements are satisfied: “(1) the......
  • United States v. Mangum, 5:16-CR-12-D-6
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Eastern District of North Carolina
    • 9 Junio 2020
    ...feigns ignorance of his grand jury testimony, or a witness who manifests his reluctance to testify at trial. See United States v. Mornan, 413 F.3d 372, 379 (3d Cir. 2005) (collecting cases); DiCaro, 772 F.2d at 1317–18, 1321–25.As for Howell's grand jury testimony, Howell physically resiste......
  • Huss v. Gayden, No. 04-60962.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 10 Junio 2009
    ...a new trial) is strictly circumscribed."). 8. Polanco v. City of Austin, 78 F.3d 968, 974 (5th Cir. 1996). 9. United States v. Mornan, 413 F.3d 372, 379 (3d Cir.2005) ("Where a defendant fails to object to the admission of evidence (including expert testimony) during trial, this Court revie......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT