U.S. v. Novak, 04-55838.
| Decision Date | 01 August 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. 04-55838.,04-55838. |
| Citation | 457 F.3d 981 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond P. NOVAK, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Brent A. Whittlesey, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil & Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Martin S. Bakst, Encino, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
1. Judge Fisher is recused.
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 cases
-
U.S. v. Novak
...whether the government can garnish retirement plans covered by ERISA as a means of enforcing criminal restitution orders.4 457 F.3d 981 (9th Cir.2006). II. To address that question, we must resolve the apparent tension between a pair of statutory provisions that, on first glance, suggest di......
1 books & journal articles
-
BLM's retained rights: how requiring environmental protection fulfills oil and gas lease obligations.
...development failed to adequately consider the potential for jeopardizing listed species, which violated the ESA); N. Alaska Envtl. Ctr., 457 F.3d at 981 (approving use of a leasing biological opinion based on a reasonable and foreseeable development scenario to meet the requirement to make ......