U.S. v. Ogles, 03-10439.
| Decision Date | 16 November 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 04-10069.,No. 03-10439.,03-10439.,04-10069. |
| Citation | 430 F.3d 1221 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Gilbert OGLES, Defendant-Appellee. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Gilbert Ogles, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Maria Davila, Esq., USTU-Office of the U.S. Attorney Evo A. Deconcini, Tucson, AZ, Michael Rotker, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Richard E. Gardiner, Fairfax, VA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
U.S. v. Ogles
...opinion, which affirms Ogles' conviction on Count One. United States v. Ogles, 406 F.3d 586 (9th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 430 F.3d 1221 (9th Cir.2005). As to Count Two, we hold that the judgment of acquittal represented a ruling that the evidence was "`legally insufficient to sustain a......
-
United States v. Hernandez
...required for § 922(a)(3), is the lower standard of willfulness. 406 F.3d 586, 590 n.1 (9th Cir. 2005), reh'g en banc granted , 430 F.3d 1221 (9th Cir. 2005) ; see United States v. Ogles , 440 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc) (adopting the relevant portion of the original panel opin......