U.S. v. Olvera, 75-1480

Citation523 F.2d 1252
Decision Date21 November 1975
Docket NumberNo. 75-1480,75-1480
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique OLVERA, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)

Larzaro Garza-Gongora, Jr., Marcel C. Notzon, II, Laredo, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U. S. Atty., James R. Gough, Jr., Anna E. Stool, Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before JONES, WISDOM and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We reverse and remand this case. There is no evidence to support a jury finding that the defendant-appellant, Enrique Olvera, possessed two grams of cocaine with intent to distribute the drug. Olvera contended that he possessed the cocaine for his personal use. The amount was too small for its possession to raise an inference that he had the cocaine with the intent to distribute it. Turner v. United States, 1970, 396 U.S. 398, 422-23, 90 S.Ct. 642, 655, 24 L.Ed.2d 610, 627. 1 The evidence purportedly showing Olvera's connection with others in the possession and distribution of heroin was either inadmissible (because of a defective warrant for the search of the house of Olvera's parents) or, as the district court held, insufficient to support the counts relating to heroin. The admission of this evidence unquestionably confused the jury on the cocaine count, or had the result of tending to confuse the jury sufficiently to require a remand of the case. New evidence is necessary to justify the retrial of Olvera for the possession of the two grams of cocaine with intent to distribute it, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

The case is reversed and remanded.

1 In Turner, the defendant possessed 14.68 grams of a cocaine-sugar mixture, 5% Of which was cocaine, for a product of 0.734 grams of cocaine. In this case, Olvera possessed 1.84 grams of a cocaine-sugar mixture, 16.8% Of which was cocaine, for a product of about 0.31 grams of cocaine.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • U.S. v. Rubio-Hernandez
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • March 2, 1999
  • U.S. v. Rodriguez
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • November 14, 1978
    ...Turner v. United States, 1970, 396 U.S. 398, 423, 90 S.Ct. 642, 655-56, 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (less than one gram cocaine); United States v. Olvera, 5 Cir. 1975, 523 F.2d 1252 (two grams Although there was no direct evidence that Albernaz and Rodriguez planned to distribute the marijuana in the Un......
  • U.S. v. Franklin
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • February 22, 1984
    ...to raise inference of intent to distribute), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 2098, 77 L.Ed.2d 306 (1983); United States v. Olvera, 523 F.2d 1252, 1253 n. 1 (5th Cir.1975) (possession of 1.84 grams of 16.8% pure cocaine too small an amount to raise inference of intent to distribute); ......
  • U.S. v. Onick, 89-1063
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • November 29, 1989
    ...Compare U.S. v. Ehlebracht, 693 F.2d 333, 339 (5th Cir.1982) (113 grams of cocaine enough to infer intent) with U.S. v. Olvera, 523 F.2d 1252, 1253 (5th Cir.1975) (1.84 grams of cocaine not enough to infer B. Maintaining a Place to Manufacture, Distribute, or Use Drugs. To convict Onick or ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT