U.S. v. Pepper's Steel & Alloys, Inc.

Decision Date31 May 1996
Citation87 F.3d 1329
PartiesU.S. v. Pepper's Steel & Alloys, Inc. NO. 94-5187
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Alabama Plating Co. v. U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • December 20, 1996
    ... ... , for Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company of Birmingham, Inc ...         James B. Rossler and W. Perry Hall ... Pepper's Steel & Alloys, Inc., 823 F.Supp. 1574 (S.D.Fla.1993), aff'd in ... ...
  • Oak Ford Owners Ass'n v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • February 28, 2007
    ... ...         Plaintiff Oak Ford Owners Association, Inc. ("Plaintiff') seeks a declaration that it has coverage ... See e.g., U.S. v. Pepper's Steel and Alloys, Inc., 823 F.Supp. 1574, 1582 (S.D.Fla.1993), ... ...
  • Pepper's Steel & Alloys, Inc. v. US
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 12, 2003
    ...compromised them in their settlement." Pepper's Steel & Alloys, 289 F.3d at 742 (quoting United States v. Pepper's Steel & Alloys, Inc., 87 F.3d 1329 (table) (No. 94-5187, 11th Cir. May 31, 1996)). On remand, the district court concluded that section 627.428 did not permit Pepper's Steel to......
  • U.S. v. Pepper's Steel & Alloys, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • April 25, 2002
    ...fees were incurred post-agreement, we cannot assume the parties compromised them in their settlement." United States v. Pepper's Steel & Alloys, Inc., 11th Cir.1996, 87 F.3d 1329, (No. 94-5187, May 31, On remand, the district court concluded that section 627.428 did not permit Pepper's Stee......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ebasco Choice Of Law: A Decision Half A Century In The Making
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • August 18, 2023
    ...law), United States v. Pepper's Steel & Alloys, 823 F. Supp. 1574, 1580 (S.D. Fla. 1993) (Florida law), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 87 F.3d 1329 (11th Cir. 1996), and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. S. Nat. Gas Co., 142 So. 3d 436 (Ala. 2013) (Alabama Nevertheless, Ebasco insur......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT