U.S. v. Perez, 90-4149
| Decision Date | 24 August 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-4149,90-4149 |
| Citation | 975 F.2d 677 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar J. PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Before McKAY, Chief Judge, LOGAN, SEYMOUR, MOORE, ANDERSON, TACHA, BALDOCK, BRORBY, EBEL, KELLY, Circuit Judges and SPARR, * District Judge.
Upon consideration of the government's petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc and the appellant's response:
The petition for rehearing is denied by the panel that rendered the decision sought to be reheard.
In accordance with Fed.R.App.P. 35(b), the clerk transmitted the suggestion for rehearing en banc to members of the panel and to all other judges of the court in regular active service. A vote was taken and pursuant thereto the court grants rehearing en banc of those issues raised in the government's petition.
Oral argument on rehearing en banc is set for Tuesday, September 29, at 2:30 p.m. in the United States Courthouse, Denver, Colorado.
* Honorable Daniel B. Sparr, District Judge, of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Powell
... ... Both questions require us to review the elements of a conspiracy ... A. Sufficiency of the Evidence ... Perez, 959 F.2d 164, 167-68 (10th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 975 F.2d 677 (10th Cir.1992), but there ... ...
-
U.S. v. Perez
...167-68. The government petitioned for rehearing en banc, urging us to reconsider Radeker. We granted the petition, see United States v. Perez, 975 F.2d 677 (10th Cir.1992), and we now hold that the per se reversible-error rule established in Radeker should be modified as set out below. Acco......
-
U.S. v. Nicholson
... ... Perez, 959 F.2d 164, 168 (internal quotation omitted), reh'g en banc granted, 975 F.2d 677 (10th ... ...
-
F.D.I.C. v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.
... ... it in support of its claim that public policy reasons expressed by Congress in the Act require us to outlaw the offending insurance policy exclusion here, we draw, if anything at all, a different ... ...