U.S. v. Petrus
| Decision Date | 27 December 1994 |
| Parties | U.S. v. Petrus * NO. 93-08544 |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 cases
-
United States v. Touchet
...cases that could not have been raised on direct appeal and would result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice. United States v. Petrus, 44 F.3d 1004, *8 (5th Cir. 1994) (citing United States v. Vaughn, 955 F.2d 367, 368 (5th Cir. 1992)). A district court may deny a § 2255 motion without c......
-
United States v. Shearod
...criminal cases that could not have been raised on direct appeal and would result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice. U.S. v. Petrus, 44 F.3d 1004 (5th Cir. 1994) (citing U.S. v. Vaughn, 955 F.2d 367, 368 (5th Cir. 1992)). A district court may deny a Section 2255 motion without conducti......
-
Versell v. Outlaw
...to follow applicable state procedural rules in raising the claims. Sawyer v. Whitley, 505 U.S. 333, 338 (1992); United States v. Petrus, 44 F.3d 1004 (5th Cir. 1994). In order to prove the "cause" prong of the test, Petitioner must show some external impediment which prevented him from rais......
-
United States v. Biyiklioglu
...cases that could not have been raised on direct appeal and would result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice." United States v. Petrus, 44 F.3d 1004, 1012 (5th Cir. 1994). Further, a district court may deny a § 2255 motion without conducting any type of evidentiary hearing if "the motion......
Request a trial to view additional results