U.S. v. Pierre, 90-8273
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA |
| Citation | 943 F.2d 6 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry James PIERRE and Otis Harris, III, Defendants-Appellants. |
| Docket Number | No. 90-8273,90-8273 |
| Decision Date | 16 September 1991 |
Page 6
v.
Terry James PIERRE and Otis Harris, III, Defendants-Appellants.
Fifth Circuit.
Kenneth D. DeHart, Alpine, Tex. (Court-appointed), for Pierre.
Charles Louis Roberts, El Paso, Tex., for Harris.
W.W. Torrey, LeRoy Morgan Jahn, Asst. U.S. Attys., Ronald F. Ederer, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Lucuis D. Bunton, III, Chief Judge.
(Opinion May 21, 1991, 5 Cir., 1991, 932 F.2d 377)
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
BY THE COURT:
A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
---------------
* Judge Alvin B. Rubin was a member of the panel that decided this case but died subsequent thereto on June 11, 1991.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Pineda-Ortuno, PINEDA-ORTUNO and C
...that the evidence is insufficient to support knowing possession and conspiracy. However, rehearing en banc has been granted in that case. 943 F.2d 6 (5th Cir.1991). Therefore, the panel decision is vacated and of no precedential value. 5th Cir.R. 41.3; Selvage v. Lynaugh, 842 F.2d 89, 91 (5......
-
U.S. v. Rideau, 91-4172
...party has suggested it. In fact, we have done so twice recently in cases implicating the Fourth Amendment. I.e., United States v. Pierre, 943 F.2d 6 (5th Cir.1991) (sua sponte granting rehearing en banc); United States v. DeLeon-Reyna, 908 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir.1990) (same). But we should take......
-
Reed v. Rogers, CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2458 SECTION "I"(2)
...App'x 638, 639 (5th Cir. 2008); Raborn v. Inpatient Management Partners, Inc., 278 F. App'x 402, 404-05 (5th Cir. 2008); Aucoin v. K-Mart, 943 F.2d 6, 8-9 (5th Cir. 1991) (upholding trial court's dismissal for failure to prosecute the slip-and-fall case of a plaintiff who failed to appear a......
-
Oliver v. Sheriff Gusman, CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2482 SECTION "S"(2)
...App'x 638, 639 (5th Cir. 2008); Raborn v. Inpatient Management Partners, Inc., 278 F. App'x 402, 404-05 (5th Cir. 2008); Aucoin v. K-Mart, 943 F.2d 6, 8-9 (5th Cir. 1991) (upholding trialPage 4court's dismissal for failure to prosecute the slip-and-fall case of a plaintiff who failed to app......
-
U.S. v. Pineda-Ortuno, PINEDA-ORTUNO and C
...that the evidence is insufficient to support knowing possession and conspiracy. However, rehearing en banc has been granted in that case. 943 F.2d 6 (5th Cir.1991). Therefore, the panel decision is vacated and of no precedential value. 5th Cir.R. 41.3; Selvage v. Lynaugh, 842 F.2d 89, 91 (5......
-
U.S. v. Rideau, 91-4172
...party has suggested it. In fact, we have done so twice recently in cases implicating the Fourth Amendment. I.e., United States v. Pierre, 943 F.2d 6 (5th Cir.1991) (sua sponte granting rehearing en banc); United States v. DeLeon-Reyna, 908 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir.1990) (same). But we should take......
-
Reed v. Rogers, CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2458 SECTION "I"(2)
...App'x 638, 639 (5th Cir. 2008); Raborn v. Inpatient Management Partners, Inc., 278 F. App'x 402, 404-05 (5th Cir. 2008); Aucoin v. K-Mart, 943 F.2d 6, 8-9 (5th Cir. 1991) (upholding trial court's dismissal for failure to prosecute the slip-and-fall case of a plaintiff who failed to appear a......
-
Oliver v. Sheriff Gusman, CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2482 SECTION "S"(2)
...App'x 638, 639 (5th Cir. 2008); Raborn v. Inpatient Management Partners, Inc., 278 F. App'x 402, 404-05 (5th Cir. 2008); Aucoin v. K-Mart, 943 F.2d 6, 8-9 (5th Cir. 1991) (upholding trialPage 4court's dismissal for failure to prosecute the slip-and-fall case of a plaintiff who failed to app......