U.S. v. Santoro

Decision Date23 June 1989
Citation880 F.2d 1319
PartiesU.S. v. Santoro NO. 89-1116
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • U.S. v. Gotti
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 16, 1999
    ...... United States v. Santoro, 647 F.Supp. 153, 161 (E.D.N.Y.1986) (citations omitted), aff'd, 880 F.2d 1319 (2d Cir.1989). .         Here, the Government has ...Veksler, 62 F.3d 544, 549 (3d Cir. 1995) ("mere suggestion that pen register equipment is now capable of misuse does not give us......
  • US v. Ruggiero
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 8, 1993
    ......Burford, 755 F.Supp. 607 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (wiretap expired on Friday; tapes sealed on Monday; "since the government sealed the tapes on the first business day after the surveillance was terminated, there is no legitimate basis for excluding the tapes from evidence"); United States v. Santoro, 647 F.Supp. 153, 163 (E.D.N.Y.1986) (Friday expiration, Monday sealing upheld), aff'd w/out op., 880 F.2d 1319 (2d Cir.1989). In sum, Cleary's claim that the electronic surveillance evidence should be suppressed because of sealing violations is utterly frivolous. .         Finally, ......
  • US v. Upton
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • June 29, 1994
    ......The government therefore relies on authorities such as United States v. Santoro, 647 F.Supp. 153, 187 (E.D.N.Y. 1986) (defendants' request for the government's witness list is denied because "there is thus nothing to balance against the government's claim that disclosure of the witness list is likely to result in subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice and witness ......
  • U.S. v. Wilson, 04-CR-1016 (NGG).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • July 14, 2006
    ......at 480); see also United States v. Rastelli, 653 F.Supp. 1034, 1055 (E.D.N.Y.1986); United States v. Santoro, 647 F.Supp. 153, 176-77 (E.D.N.Y.1986), aff'd mem., 880 F.2d 1319 (2d Cir.1989). .         Wilson's motion to strike this language is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT