U.S. v. Sigma International Inc.
| Citation | 244 F.3d 841 |
| Decision Date | 15 March 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-2618,97-2618 |
| Parties | (11th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIGMA INTERNATIONAL, INC., d.b.a. Sigma U.S.A., Inc., Charles Sternisha, et al., Defendants-Appellants. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
NOTE: THE COURT HAS VACATED THIS OPINION. SEE OPINION OF APRIL 8, 2002.
To continue reading
Request your trial
14 cases
-
Byrne v. Nezhat, No. 99-12623
...for Manov's medical malpractice claim, included the dismissal of the remaining counts of the complaint. See United States v. Sigma Intern., Inc., 244 F.3d 841, 852 (11th Cir. 2001) (In determining whether the court abused its discretion we ask whether it "applie[d] the wrong legal standard ......
-
United States v. Fisher, 15–CR–19–A
...the court." United States v. Leeper , No. 06–CR–58A, 2006 WL 1455485, at *2 (W.D.N.Y. May 22, 2016) (quoting United States v. Sigma Int'l, Inc. , 244 F.3d 841, 856 (11th Cir. 2001), rehearing en banc grantedandopinion vacated by 287 F.3d 1325 (citations omitted and emphasis in original)). T......
-
Sikes v. Teleline, Inc., No. 99-8007.
...findings of fact that are clearly erroneous, In re Celotex Corp., 227 F.3d 1336, 1338 (11th Cir. 2000)." United States v. Sigma Int'l, Inc., 244 F.3d 841, 851-52 (11th Cir.2001). If "the district court properly exercised its discretion within the parameters of Rule 23, the court's determina......
-
United States v. Mix, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 12-171
...Williams, this alleged "failure" does not warrant the dismissal of any of the three indictments. Mix relies on United States v. Sigma International, 244 F.3d 841 (11th Cir. 2001), for the proposition that "in order for an indictment to be recognized as actually issuing from a grand jury, it......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Motion practice
...of such violations.” Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States , 487 U.S. 250, 256 (1988). See also United States v. Sigma Intern., Inc. , 244 F.3d 841, 856-58, 870-73 (11th Cir. 2001) (dismissing indictment for improper comments to the grand jury, including statements implying that defendants h......
-
Grand jury proceedings
...of a guideline does not also violate the Constitution, a statute, or a rule of criminal procedure. See United States v. Sigma Int’l Inc. , 244 F.3d 841, 857 n.41 (11th Cir. 2001) (citing United States v. Williams , 504 U.S. at 46-47), opinion vacated on other grounds , 287 F.3d 1325 (11th C......
-
Constitutional Criminal Procedure - Charles E. Cox, Jr.
...wife would bearrested if he did not confess)). 71. . Id. at 1297 (citing Martin v. Kemp, 760 F.2d 1244 (11th Cir. 1985)). 72. . Id. 73. . 244 F.3d 841 (11th Cir. 2001). Editor's Note: As of the date of this Article'spublication, this opinion has been vacated and an en banc rehearing has bee......