U.S. v. Southland Management Corporation
| Decision Date | 23 September 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. 00-60267.,00-60267. |
| Citation | 307 F.3d 352 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHLAND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; et al., Defendants, W. Thad McLaurin; Charles C. Taylor, Jr.; Arthur W. Doty, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
John S. Koppel (argued), Douglas N. Letter, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div.-App. Staff, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Alan W. Perry (argued), Roland M. Slover, Forman, Perry, Watkins, Krutz & Tardy, Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellees.
William Bradley Tully, John Robert Hellow, Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, Los Angeles, CA, for Federation of American Hospitals, Amicus Curiae.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; Tom S. Lee, Chief Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion April 11, 2002, 5 Cir., 2002, 288 F.3d 665)
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. ex rel. a+ Homecare v. Medshares Management
...portions of the United States Code. United States v. Southland Mgmt. Corp., 288 F.3d 665, 674 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 307 F.3d 352 (5th Cir.2002). While we have compared the two provisions in the past to interpret statutory language, see United States v. McBride, 362 F.3d 360, 37......
-
United States v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
...knowledge of the relevant facts." United States v. Southland Mgmt. Corp., 288 F.3d 665, 686 (5th Cir. 2002), vacated and reh'g granted, 307 F.3d 352, cited with approval in Becker, 305 F.3d at 289; see also United States ex rel. Burlbaw v. Orenduff, 548 F.3d 931, 952 (10th Cir. 2008) (notin......
-
U.S. ex rel. Longhi v. U.S.
...United States v. Southland Mgmt. Corp. (Southland I), 288 F.3d 665, 676 (5th Cir.2002), vacated by grant of reh'g en banc, 307 F.3d 352 (5th Cir.2002) (quoting United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 489, 117 S.Ct. 921, 137 L.Ed.2d 107 (1997)). In Southland I, however, we noted two different ......
-
U.S. ex rel. Graves v. Itt Educational Services
...with that provision." United States v. Southland Management Corp., 288 F.3d 665, 679 (5th Cir.2002), reh'g en banc granted, 307 F.3d 352 (5th Cir.2002). In that case, the court emphasized the two elements necessary to state a claim under a false certification theory of False Claims Act liab......