U.S. v. Torres, 92-5246
| Decision Date | 04 March 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-5246,92-5246 |
| Citation | 77 F.3d 91 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Madelyn TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro; Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-30-G).
ARGUED: John Randolph Riley, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert H. Edmunds, Jr., United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, WILKINS, NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.
Prior report: 65 F.3d 1241 (1995).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an evenly-divided vote of the en banc court.
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Letsinger
...when we granted rehearing en banc; ultimately, we affirmed the judgment of conviction by an equally divided court. United States v. Torres, 77 F.3d 91 (4th Cir.1996) (en banc). Though no one can rely on Torres for precedent, I nonetheless find the logic of the panel opinion persuasive in it......
-
U.S. v. Banks
... ... Torres, 65 F.3d 1241, 1246 (4th Cir.1995) (holding that while "some of the five factors ultimately relied ... ...