U.S. v. Trevino, 77-5234

Decision Date28 September 1977
Docket NumberNo. 77-5234,77-5234
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo Valadez TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant. Summary Calendar. *
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Amador C. Garcia, Corpus Christi, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

James R. Gough, U. S. Atty., Mary L. Sinderson, George A. Kelt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., Robert A. Berg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Corpus Christi, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, RONEY and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Trevino appeals from his conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1) (1972). His sole contention on appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. We affirm.

The appellant was a passenger in a car which was stopped at the permanent Border Patrol checkpoint seven miles south of Falfurrias, Texas. While questioning the driver, the Border Patrol Agent detected the odor of marijuana. He had probable cause for the search and asked for the key to the trunk, but the driver said he did not have one in his possession. During the questioning, however, a state game warden standing near the car saw the driver hand Trevino a set of keys, one of which he recognized as a trunk key. The appellant took the keys and made a downward motion with his hand as though to hide them. The warden then reached into the car, grabbed the keys, and opened the trunk which contained 141 pounds of marijuana.

Trevino's action in surreptitiously taking the key to the car's trunk after the driver had told the Agent he did not have one amply supports the inference that Trevino was aiding and abetting the possession of marijuana.

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • U.S. v. Richardson, 87-1671
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • June 21, 1988
    ...See Moreno, 579 F.2d at 372; Williams-Hendricks, 805 F.2d at 501 (nervous behavior at inspection station). See also United States v. Trevino, 560 F.2d 194 (5th Cir.1977). Cf. Aguila-Reyes, 722 F.2d at 158 (driver's lack of concern or surprise after being told that narcotics had been found i......
  • U.S. v. Natel, 86-2611
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • March 5, 1987
    ...that a jury may rely upon, along with other evidence, in finding conspiratorial activity by the defendant. See United States v. Trevino, 560 F.2d 194, 197 (5th Cir.1977). Viewing the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the government, we find the evidence suffi......
  • U.S. v. Newbern, 83-7145
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • May 3, 1984
    ...them to the airplane strengthens the conclusion that Newbern and Sheppard were active members of the conspiracy. United States v. Trevino, 560 F.2d 194 (5th Cir.1977). A jury could reasonably conclude that Newbern and Sheppard were not innocent pilots simply hired to fly an airplane. Seldom......
  • U.S. v. Sandoval
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • June 6, 1988
    ...825 (5th Cir.1987).14 United States v. Magee, 821 F.2d 234, 239 (5th Cir.1987).15 Natel, 812 F.2d at 940 (citing United States v. Trevino, 560 F.2d 194, 197 (5th Cir.1977)).16 United States v. Gardea Carrasco, 830 F.2d 41 (5th Cir.1987); United States v. Moreno-Hinojosa, 804 F.2d 845 (5th C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT