U.S. v. Troise, Nos. 84-5171
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
Writing for the Court | Before WALLACE, FARRIS and CANBY; CANBY |
Citation | 796 F.2d 310 |
Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Carl TROISE, Pedro Iguaran, Tracy Lee Maudlin, John Linn Jeppesen, Defendants-Appellants. Civ. A. |
Docket Number | 84-5175,84-5219 and 84-5220,Nos. 84-5171 |
Decision Date | 07 August 1986 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 practice notes
-
People v. Sanchez
...for different law enforcement agencies to cooperate to ensure obedience to the law." (United States v. Troise (9th Cir. 1986) 796 F.2d 310, 312.) In any event, the encounter, arrest and search here were constitutional. Section 1357 of Title 8 of the United States Code authorizes the of......
-
US v. Rasheed, Cr. No. 91-01329 ACK.
...Id. (citing United States v. Ramsey, 431 U.S. 606, 614-18, 97 S.Ct. 1972, 1978-80, 52 L.Ed.2d 617 (1977); accord, United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310 (9th Cir.1986) (border searches "need not be based on a warrant or probable cause, or even on mere suspicion." Id. at 313.). Ther......
-
US v. Fernandez Ventura, Crim. No. 94-364 (JAF).
...that Customs is an inherently custodial setting, regardless of the circumstances of the interrogation. 8 See United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310, 314 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Hickman, 523 F.2d 323 (9th Cir.1975). Though there exists no official listing of permissible routine quest......
-
U.S. v. Kiam, No. CRIM.04-436.
...to the United States") (quoting United States v. Lueck, 678 F.2d 895, 899 (11th Cir.1982)) (emphasis added); United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310, 314 (9th Cir.1986) ("Routine questioning by the Coast Guard or Customs officials is not the sort of custodial situation that normally......
Request a trial to view additional results
21 cases
-
People v. Sanchez
...for different law enforcement agencies to cooperate to ensure obedience to the law." (United States v. Troise (9th Cir. 1986) 796 F.2d 310, 312.) In any event, the encounter, arrest and search here were constitutional. Section 1357 of Title 8 of the United States Code authorizes the of......
-
US v. Rasheed, Cr. No. 91-01329 ACK.
...Id. (citing United States v. Ramsey, 431 U.S. 606, 614-18, 97 S.Ct. 1972, 1978-80, 52 L.Ed.2d 617 (1977); accord, United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310 (9th Cir.1986) (border searches "need not be based on a warrant or probable cause, or even on mere suspicion." Id. at 313.). Ther......
-
US v. Fernandez Ventura, Crim. No. 94-364 (JAF).
...that Customs is an inherently custodial setting, regardless of the circumstances of the interrogation. 8 See United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310, 314 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Hickman, 523 F.2d 323 (9th Cir.1975). Though there exists no official listing of permissible routine quest......
-
U.S. v. Kiam, No. CRIM.04-436.
...to the United States") (quoting United States v. Lueck, 678 F.2d 895, 899 (11th Cir.1982)) (emphasis added); United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310, 314 (9th Cir.1986) ("Routine questioning by the Coast Guard or Customs officials is not the sort of custodial situation that normally......
Request a trial to view additional results