U.S. v. Troise, Nos. 84-5171

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtBefore WALLACE, FARRIS and CANBY; CANBY
Citation796 F.2d 310
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Carl TROISE, Pedro Iguaran, Tracy Lee Maudlin, John Linn Jeppesen, Defendants-Appellants. Civ. A.
Docket Number84-5175,84-5219 and 84-5220,Nos. 84-5171
Decision Date07 August 1986
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 practice notes
  • People v. Sanchez
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • September 25, 1987
    ...for different law enforcement agencies to cooperate to ensure obedience to the law." (United States v. Troise (9th Cir. 1986) 796 F.2d 310, 312.) In any event, the encounter, arrest and search here were constitutional. Section 1357 of Title 8 of the United States Code authorizes the of......
  • US v. Rasheed, Cr. No. 91-01329 ACK.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Hawaii
    • July 23, 1992
    ...Id. (citing United States v. Ramsey, 431 U.S. 606, 614-18, 97 S.Ct. 1972, 1978-80, 52 L.Ed.2d 617 (1977); accord, United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310 (9th Cir.1986) (border searches "need not be based on a warrant or probable cause, or even on mere suspicion." Id. at 313.). Ther......
  • US v. Fernandez Ventura, Crim. No. 94-364 (JAF).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • June 30, 1995
    ...that Customs is an inherently custodial setting, regardless of the circumstances of the interrogation. 8 See United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310, 314 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Hickman, 523 F.2d 323 (9th Cir.1975). Though there exists no official listing of permissible routine quest......
  • U.S. v. Kiam, No. CRIM.04-436.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • November 4, 2004
    ...to the United States") (quoting United States v. Lueck, 678 F.2d 895, 899 (11th Cir.1982)) (emphasis added); United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310, 314 (9th Cir.1986) ("Routine questioning by the Coast Guard or Customs officials is not the sort of custodial situation that normally......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
21 cases
  • People v. Sanchez
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • September 25, 1987
    ...for different law enforcement agencies to cooperate to ensure obedience to the law." (United States v. Troise (9th Cir. 1986) 796 F.2d 310, 312.) In any event, the encounter, arrest and search here were constitutional. Section 1357 of Title 8 of the United States Code authorizes the of......
  • US v. Rasheed, Cr. No. 91-01329 ACK.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Hawaii
    • July 23, 1992
    ...Id. (citing United States v. Ramsey, 431 U.S. 606, 614-18, 97 S.Ct. 1972, 1978-80, 52 L.Ed.2d 617 (1977); accord, United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310 (9th Cir.1986) (border searches "need not be based on a warrant or probable cause, or even on mere suspicion." Id. at 313.). Ther......
  • US v. Fernandez Ventura, Crim. No. 94-364 (JAF).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • June 30, 1995
    ...that Customs is an inherently custodial setting, regardless of the circumstances of the interrogation. 8 See United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310, 314 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Hickman, 523 F.2d 323 (9th Cir.1975). Though there exists no official listing of permissible routine quest......
  • U.S. v. Kiam, No. CRIM.04-436.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • November 4, 2004
    ...to the United States") (quoting United States v. Lueck, 678 F.2d 895, 899 (11th Cir.1982)) (emphasis added); United States v. Troise, 796 F.2d 310, 314 (9th Cir.1986) ("Routine questioning by the Coast Guard or Customs officials is not the sort of custodial situation that normally......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT