U.S. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., Nos. 79-4109
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | DUNIWAY |
| Citation | 648 F.2d 642 |
| Parties | 1981-1 Trade Cases 64,112 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, andMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Defendants-Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee. |
| Docket Number | 79-4332 and 79-4333,Nos. 79-4109 |
| Decision Date | 18 June 1981 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
56 cases
-
Terrebonne, Ltd. of California v. Murray, No. CIV-F-95-5296 OWW DLB.
...the party seeks to show that it was impossible to comply with the court's discovery orders. United States v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 648 F.2d 642, 652 (9th Cir.1981). This is not a case where a party is being sanctioned for failure to comply with a court order. The disqualified attorneys ......
-
Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. Miller Brewing Co., No. 81-4214
...has broad discretion to design a coercive contempt remedy that will bring about compliance); United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 648 F.2d 642, 651 (9th Cir.1981) (choice of discovery sanctions left to discretion of district If the fine imposed on Falstaff contained elements of bot......
-
In re Indep. Serv. Organizations Antitrust Lit., No. CIV.A. MDL-1021.
...606, 609 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1064, 108 S.Ct. 1023, 98 L.Ed.2d 988 (1988); United States v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 648 F.2d 642, 647 (9th Cir.1981); SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 645 F.2d 1195, 1206 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1016, 102 S.Ct. 1708, 72 L.Ed.2d 132 ......
-
In re Frieda Q., No. 11–1284.
...upheld imposition of a per diem fine as a sanction for civil contempt, we found the following passage from United States v. Westinghouse, 648 F.2d 642, 651 (9th Cir.1981), to be consistent with our view of the nature of a civil contempt: [T]he purpose [of the fines] was to compel the compan......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Antitrust and Intellectual Property
...386, 406-07 (1945). 87. United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 471 F. Supp. 532 (N.D. Cal. 1978), aff’d in part and rev’d in part , 648 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1981). 88. Id . at 541. 89. United States v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., 141 F. Supp. 118 (N.D. Ill. 1956). that incorporated the pat......