U.S. v. White, 94-1594

Citation42 F.3d 457
Decision Date07 December 1994
Docket NumberNo. 94-1594,94-1594
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Robert E. WHITE, Appellant.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)

Ramona L. Marten, St. Louis, MO, argued (N. Scott Rosenblum, on the brief), for appellant.

Howard J. Marcus, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, MO, argued, for appellee.

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

Robert E. White appeals from the district court's 1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his rental truck after a traffic stop. White entered a conditional plea of guilty to possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841(a)(1), and was sentenced to a term of sixty months imprisonment. We affirm.

On the morning of February 13, 1993, patrolling Interstate 44 in St. Louis County, Corporal Sean Moore of the Missouri Highway Patrol saw a Hertz-Penske rental truck swerve from the center lane to the right lane, swerve again from the right lane all the way to the left lane, and then return to the center lane. He pulled the truck over and asked if the driver, White, was tired or if he had been drinking. White responded that he had been picking something up from the floor of the truck. Corporal Moore asked for White's license and rental agreement. The license showed an El Paso address, and the rental agreement showed that the truck had been picked up in Albuquerque and paid for in cash by White. White stated that he was employed by "P & E Rug Company," and that he was delivering Mexican blankets to Cleveland, but was unable to state the address in Cleveland. White was also unable to provide a bill of lading, shipping papers or a commercial transportation permit for the blankets. In the passenger area of the truck, Moore saw a radar detector, laser detector and ham radio.

Corporal Moore issued a warning ticket to White, and then asked why the truck had been rented in Albuquerque. White responded that, although his employers were based in El Paso, he had picked up the blankets in Albuquerque. He appeared to be extremely nervous, and his eyes were very wide. Moore returned the driver's license and rental agreement and told White that he was free to go, but asked him if he could search the truck. White answered yes.

Moore asked White if he could open the sliding door between the cab and the cargo area. White answered affirmatively. In the cargo area of the truck, there were several clothing bags and many stacks of Mexican blankets. Moore then asked if he could look through the area between the driver's area and the sliding door, to which White again answered affirmatively. In this area, Moore saw several blankets covering cardboard boxes. White stated that there were two boxes containing an expensive variety of Mexican blankets. Moore, however, saw four boxes, and noted, shining a flashlight through an opening in one of the boxes, that the blankets in it were crumpled, rather than neatly folded like the blankets in the cargo area. Moore asked White if he could open one of the boxes. White did not agree to allow Moore to open the boxes, and asked Moore why he was "harassing" him.

At 10:10 a.m., Moore requested that a drug dog be sent to the site of the stop, and told White that he was free to leave, but that the truck would be detained pending arrival of the dog. White chose to stay at the site. Trooper Wade Stewart arrived at the site, and offered to drive White to a nearby restaurant with a telephone, but White declined. White told Stewart that he had bought the blankets at a swap meet in Albuquerque.

At 11:30 a.m., Corporal Althange arrived at the site with the drug dog. The dog "alerted" to the driver's side door of the truck, and then to the exposed box in which Moore had seen the crumpled blankets. Corporal Moore then opened one of the boxes, finding a bale of marijuana under two or three blankets. Three of the four boxes in that area of the truck contained marijuana, for a total of 370 pounds. White was placed under arrest.

White moved to suppress the evidence found during the search of the truck. Following a hearing, the district court denied the motion and admitted the evidence. White entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. He was sentenced to sixty months imprisonment and has appealed the district court's denial of his motion to suppress.

White first argues that the initial stop by Corporal Moore was pretextual. We review the district court's finding that the initial stop was not pretextual for clear error. United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 915 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc). Any traffic violation, however minor, provides probable cause for a traffic stop. United States v. Barahona, 990 F.2d 412, 416 (8th Cir.1993). An abrupt change of lanes without signaling constitutes a legitimate reason for a traffic stop. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d at 915. The uncontested evidence showed that White committed a traffic violation by swerving across lanes repeatedly, and the district court did not err in finding that the stop was not pretextual. Once Moore stopped White, he was entitled to ask for White's license and rental agreement and to ask White about his destination and purpose. See id. The reasonable scope of the initial traffic stop extended...

To continue reading

Request your trial
70 cases
  • U.S. v. Beck
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 6 Abril 1998
    ...check was within reasonable scope of detention), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 872, 116 S.Ct. 195, 133 L.Ed.2d 130 (1995); United States v. White, 42 F.3d 457, 459 (8th Cir.1994) (holding that request for license, destination, and purpose of trip within reasonable scope of detention); United State......
  • US v. Morris
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 11 Diciembre 1995
    ...of the factual circumstances is reviewed de novo. United States v. Pereira-Munoz, 59 F.3d 788, 791 (8th Cir.1995); United States v. White, 42 F.3d 457, 460 (8th Cir.1994); United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 918 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 1970, 131......
  • State v. Teagle
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • 1 Noviembre 2007
    ...defendant for two hours and fifty-five minutes while awaiting arrival of drug dog in remote area not unreasonable); United States v. White, 42 F.3d 457, 460 (8th Cir.1994) (determining that it was reasonable for an officer to detain a truck for eighty minutes while awaiting the arrival of a......
  • United States v. Steffens
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 4 Noviembre 2019
    ...reasons for an investigatory stop or encounter. See United States v. Woods , 829 F.3d 675, 679 (8th Cir. 2016) ; United States v. White , 42 F.3d 457, 460 (8th Cir. 1994). The drugs found on Steffens, combined with his potential outstanding warrant for "dangerous drugs" and the factors that......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT