U.S. v. Williams, No. 75-1566
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before DUNIWAY and ELY; ELY |
| Citation | 536 F.2d 810 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charles Raymond WILLIAMS, Appellant. |
| Docket Number | No. 75-1566 |
| Decision Date | 26 January 1976 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 practice notes
-
U.S. v. Grunsfeld, Nos. 75-2354
...him the necessary proprietary interest and expectation of privacy to complain of the illegal entry. Compare United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 810, 812-13 (9th Cir. 1976), with United States v. Burke, 506 F.2d 1165, 1170-71 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 915, 95 S.Ct. 1576, 43 L.E......
-
U.S. v. Davis, No. 80-7329
...United States v. Durades, 607 F.2d 818, 820 n.1 (9th Cir. 1979); United States v. Barnard, 490 F.2d at 910; United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 810, 812 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 839, 97 S.Ct. 110, 50 L.Ed.2d 106 Mrs. Davis makes the additional argument that she was improperly trie......
-
U.S. v. Tzolov, Docket Nos. 10–562–cr (Lead)
...was sufficient to constitute an overt act committed in course of alleged conspiracy so that venue was proper); United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 810, 812 (9th Cir.1976) (coconspirator's flight over the Southern District of California, while en route to obtain marijuana, was sufficient to ......
-
U.S. v. Schoor, No. 78-2435
...appropriate in any district where an overt act committed in the course of the conspiracy occurred. See e. g., United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 810 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 839, 97 S.Ct. 110, 50 L.Ed.2d 106 (1976). Schoor's and Hunfeld's reentry into the United States at San Fra......
Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
-
U.S. v. Grunsfeld, Nos. 75-2354
...him the necessary proprietary interest and expectation of privacy to complain of the illegal entry. Compare United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 810, 812-13 (9th Cir. 1976), with United States v. Burke, 506 F.2d 1165, 1170-71 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 915, 95 S.Ct. 1576, 43 L.E......
-
U.S. v. Davis, No. 80-7329
...United States v. Durades, 607 F.2d 818, 820 n.1 (9th Cir. 1979); United States v. Barnard, 490 F.2d at 910; United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 810, 812 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 839, 97 S.Ct. 110, 50 L.Ed.2d 106 Mrs. Davis makes the additional argument that she was improperly trie......
-
U.S. v. Tzolov, Docket Nos. 10–562–cr (Lead)
...was sufficient to constitute an overt act committed in course of alleged conspiracy so that venue was proper); United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 810, 812 (9th Cir.1976) (coconspirator's flight over the Southern District of California, while en route to obtain marijuana, was sufficient to ......
-
U.S. v. Schoor, No. 78-2435
...appropriate in any district where an overt act committed in the course of the conspiracy occurred. See e. g., United States v. Williams, 536 F.2d 810 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 839, 97 S.Ct. 110, 50 L.Ed.2d 106 (1976). Schoor's and Hunfeld's reentry into the United States at San Fra......
Request a trial to view additional results