U.S. v. Woodley, 82-1028
| Decision Date | 26 April 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-1028,82-1028 |
| Citation | 732 F.2d 111 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Janet WOODLEY, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Elliot Enoki, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellee.
Pamela J. Berman, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant-appellant.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY,
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn, 726 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir.1983).
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
U.S. v. Woodley
...conviction. United States v. Woodley, 726 F.2d 1328, 1339 (9th Cir.1983). The court having convened en banc, United States v. Woodley, 732 F.2d 111 (9th Cir.1984) (order granting rehearing en banc), we hold that the recess appointment clause extends to judicial officers and that a recess ap......
- Torrey v. Estelle
-
Stoltz v. State
... ... Accordingly, because we find no federal due process precedent compelling us to reconsider our decisions in Wright, supra, and Allender, supra, we conclude the trial court did ... ...
-
Dickson v. United States, CASE NO. 5:10-CR-50124
...the Eighth Circuit, as a means of determining whether counsel's advice or failure to advise is reasonable. See, e.g., George v. Black, 732 F.2d at 111. The failure to advise Dickson as to thePage 8 possible registration requirements of the SORA did not constitute ineffective assistance, as ......