Umans v. United States
Decision Date | 01 October 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 41,41 |
Parties | Sam UMANS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
See 389 U.S. 1025, 88 S.Ct. 583.
Edward Brodsky, New York City, for petitioner.
Sidney M. Glazer, for respondent.
On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice HARLAN would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Waterman's opinion for that court in United States v. Umans, 2 Cir., 368 F.2d 725.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial- United States v. New Orleans Book Mart, Inc.
-
Paris Adult Theatre v. Slaton 8212 1051
... ... Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419; Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498. P. 54 ... 2. The ... ...
-
State v. Moats
...indictment founded solely on hearsay); cf. United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725 (2d Cir.1966), cert. dismissed, 389 U.S. 80, 88 S.Ct. 253, 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967). A grand jury indictment may indeed be founded solely on hearsay. Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 76 S.Ct. 406, 100 L.Ed.......
- United States v. Groner
-
18 APPENDIX U.S.C. § 5.1 Preliminary Hearing
...Available, 43 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 578 (1968); United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d. 725 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted 389 U.S. 80 (1967); United States v. Andrews, 381 F.2d 377, 378 (2d Cir. 1967); United States v. Messina, 388 F.2d 393, 394 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1968); and United......