Underwood v. California
| Decision Date | 10 January 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-5448,82-5448 |
| Citation | 103 S.Ct. 769,459 U.S. 1136,74 L.Ed.2d 983 |
| Parties | Timothy William UNDERWOOD, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
For the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in Holloway v. Florida, 449 U.S. 905, 101 S.Ct. 281, 66 L.Ed.2d 137 (1980), I would grant the petition for certiorari and afford this case plenary consideration. See also Spaziano v. Florida, 454 U.S. 1037 and 1041, 102 S.Ct. 581 and 583, 70 L.Ed.2d 484 (1981) (dissenting opinions).
To continue reading
Request your trial
98 cases
-
Adkins v. State
... ... Thus, any error by the reference to the statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 828, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) ... Next, the petitioner contends that his trial counsel was ... ...
-
State v. Van Tran
... ... Cf. Boyde v. California, 494 U.S. 370, 380-381, 110 S.Ct. 1190, 1198, 108 L.Ed.2d 316 (1990). (In jury deliberations "common sense understanding of the instructions in the ... ...
- Williams v. Armontrout
-
State v. Bridges
... ... See Chimel v. California", 395 U.S. 752, 762-63, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 2040, 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969); State v. Marshall, 870 S.W.2d 532, 540 (Tenn.Crim.App.1993) ... \xC2" ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results