Underwood v. United States
| Decision Date | 04 March 1941 |
| Docket Number | No. 9455.,9455. |
| Citation | 118 F.2d 760 |
| Parties | UNDERWOOD v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
B. K. Goree, Geo. W. Rice, and W. S. Harris, all of Fort Worth, Tex., for appellant.
Steve M. King, U. S. Atty., and Fred Hull, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Beaumont, Tex., for appellee.
Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.
Appellant brought this suit to cancel certain tax liens filed by the United States against two tracts of land in Gregg County, Texas, as a cloud upon his title. The facts were stipulated. Those material are as follows:
Brown McCallum, J. S. Presnall, Jr., and C. W. (Jack) Buckley were partners doing business as Hanover Refining Co. A permit to carry on a gasoline refinery was issued to Hanover Refining Co.; the business was registered in the name of the company; all taxes paid to the United States were paid in the name of the company. Presnall and McCallum each owned one of the tracts of land individually and were jointly indebted to appellant in a sum exceeding $1,000,000. On December 4, 1935, they jointly executed and delivered to appellant a trust deed covering both tracts to secure their indebtedness. The deed of trust was not recorded as required by Art. 6627 R.C.S. of Texas 1925, until March 12, 1936. Thereafter the trust deed was foreclosed and the property, of the value of $1250.00, was bought in by appellant. In the meantime, on February 20, 1936, after the trust deed was executed but before it was recorded, the United States filed for record in the tax lien records of Gregg County, notices of tax liens for gasoline taxes against McCallum, Presnall and Buckley, doing business as Hanover Refining Co., for the months of February, March and April, 1934, aggregating $4,964.99.
In the District Court plaintiff contended and here contends the Government's lien is not superior to plaintiff's prior and unrecorded deed of trust and that it attached only to the partnership property of Hanover Refining Company and did not attach to the property individually owned by McCallum and Presnall.
In a well considered opinion, reviewing Texas and Federal authorities, the District Court held that the United States was a creditor; that the trust deed was void as to creditors until recorded; and therefore the tax lien was superior to the unrecorded mortgage lien.
Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, Section 3670, 26 U. S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 3670, the United States is entitled...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pitts v. United States (In re Pitts)
...is the primary obligor and its partners are jointly and severally liable on its debts.” (footnote omitted)); Underwood v. United States, 118 F.2d 760, 761 (5th Cir.1941) (same). While Pitts has not raised any due-process challenges regarding administrative enforcement in this appeal,3 the C......
-
Pitts v. United States (In re Pitts)
...Crockett, 150 F.Supp. 352, 354 (N.D.Cal.1957); Young v. U.S. I.R.S., Dep't of Treasury, 387 F.Supp.2d 143 (E.D.N.Y.2005); Underwood v. U.S., 118 F.2d 760 (5th Cir.1941); Remington v. U.S., 210 F.3d 281 (5th Cir.2000). In each of the cited cases, the courts approved the use of administrative......
-
United States v. Davidson
...Tex. 509, 116 S.W.2d 1064; 14 Tex.Jur. 987. 3 Shear Co. v. Currie, 5 Cir., 295 F. 841; In re Lindahl, D.C., 59 F.2d 91; Underwood v. United States, 5 Cir., 118 F.2d 760; Ayres v. Duprey, 27 Tex. 593, 86 Am.Dec. 657; McKamey v. Thorp, 61 Tex. 648; Hirt v. Werneburg, Tex.Civ. App., 191 S.W. 7......
-
Rochelle v. U.S.
...debts of the partnership once the partnership is adjudicated bankrupt though prior to actual distribution of assets. 6 Underwood v. U. S., 118 F.2d 760, 761 (CA5, 1941); Young v. Riddell, 283 F.2d 909, 910 (CA9, 1960), Aff'g. 60-1 U.S.T.C. par. 9381, p. 76,054 (S.D.Cal., 1959); Adams v. U. ......