Union Local 1296, Intern. Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Kennewick, 43540
Decision Date | 04 December 1975 |
Docket Number | No. 43540,43540 |
Citation | Union Local 1296, Intern. Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Kennewick, 542 P.2d 1252, 86 Wn.2d 156 (Wash. 1975) |
Parties | , 92 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2118, 80 Lab.Cas. P 54,000 UNION LOCAL 1296, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS, Appellant, v. The CITY OF KENNEWICK, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Critchlow, Williams, Ryals & Schuster, David E. Williams, Richland, for appellant.
Horton, Wilkins & Faurholt, Hugh B. Horton, Kennewick, for respondent.
This appeal deals with the validity of an arbitration proceeding.
There were negotiations between the respondent herein, the City of Kennewick, and the appellant, a regularly qualified collective bargaining representative of the city firefighters.The parties could not reach an agreement on some matters and after efforts to negotiate, the disputed items were submitted to arbitration under the provisions of RCW 41.56.The parties each submitted to the Director of Labor and Industries a list of three names.The director appointed from the list submitted by the union David E. Williams, an attorney with offices in Richland.The director also received a list from the city and from that list appointed Wesley N. Wilson, an attorney with offices in Yakima.The director appointed Roger Buchanan, then a resident of Olympia and a professional in the field of labor relations as the third or neutral member of the arbitration panel.
Thereafter, on March 11 and 12, 1974, the arbitration hearings were held in the offices of the Department of Labor and Industries in Kennewick.Both sides were fully heard.Thereafter, more testimony was needed as to hours of work.That hearing was held in Richland on April 9, 1974 and testimony was received from James I. Deines, the city's fire chief, and from one Larry Sleater, a fireman.The Richland location for the hearing was selected by Mr. Buchanan.After hearing the additional evidence, the panel went into executive session to consider its decision.
After considerable time spent discussing the matter, Buchanan announced his decision in executive session.The decision, while initially oral, was later reduced to writing.There was never any change from the substance of that original decision.The written statement of his oral decision is as follows:
(1) With respect to the issue of Wages, the matter should be determined on the basis of the memo signed by Colby and Comstock on 11--12--73, effective 4--1--74, and that the plan set forth by the city should become effective on 7--1--74 and that there should be an additional 3% Increase effective 1--1--74, plus the COL arrangement referred to in such memo.
(2) With respect to the question of Life insurance, the existing program should remain in effect.
(3) With respect to Medical insurance, the parties should adopt the 'Pasco plan.'
(4) With respect to Sick leave, it should remain at 12 hours, but 25% Of accumulated leave should be allowed; leave should be taken and charged by the hour.
(5) With respect to a Dental plan, it should be included per the memo aforesaid.
(6) With respect to Overtime, it should be handled per such memo.
(7) With respect to Holidays, the existing arrangements should remain in effect.
(8) With respect to Work week, the parties should go to 49 hours, effective January 1, 1975, with commensurate restrictions on taking of 'kelly days.'
(9) The employer should be granted an 'employer rights' clause, reading essentially as follows:
After the arbitrators emerged from executive session they were in the company of Chief Deines and Fireman Sleater.Buchanan required transportation to the Pasco airport.It was discussed and Williams was unwilling to drive Buchanan to the airport as he(Williams) was anxious to get home.Wilson said his route would be in the opposite direction and it would be inconvenient for him to go to the airport.Williams then asked Sleater to take Buchanan to the airport and Sleater did so.
Upon their arrival at the Pasco airport, Sleater and Buchanan had for drinks each in the bar.Each bought two drinks for himself and two for the other person.This took place during a period variously estimated from forty-five minutes to two hours.The findings of fact place the time at from one and a half hours to one hour and forty-five minutes.Both Buchanan and Sleater agree that the arbitration was never discussed between them.
No one raised any objection to the arrangements for Sleater taking Buchanan to the airport, although it was known to and discussed by Williams, Wilson and Chief Deines, as well as Sleater and Buchanan.
The city has sought to avoid the award of the arbitrators because of the drinking incident at the airport.The city relies primarily upon a number of cases in the field of zoning in which the 'appearance of fairness' doctrine has been applied.Two actions were filed in the Superior Court for Benton County, which actions were consolidated.The consolidated cases were tried and the court decided the arbitration should be overturned only because the incident at the airport violated the appearance of fairness.
Other matters were presented to the trial court.All of the other questions were decided in favor of the validity of the arbitration, and the city did not cross appeal.We, therefore, do not consider those questions.
Findings of fact No. 11 through 22 relate to the matter now before the court.Those findings are set forth in full:
XI
That on April 9, 1974, the arbitrators met to discuss their decision.That at a portion of that evening, one of the negotiators for the Union, a Larry Sleater, and Chief Deines were present and met with the arbitrators.That at the end of the evening, Mr. Williams requested Mr. Sleater to take the neutral arbitrator to the airport.That this request was in the presence of the arbitrator representing the interests of the City.
XII
That upon the arrival of the neutral arbitrator, Roger Buchanan, and Larry Sleater, the two went into a bar at the Pasco Airport and were drinking together for a period of one and one-half to one and three-quarter hours.During this period of time, Sleater and Buchanan were alone.They each drank four drinks at the cocktail lounge, with Buchanan buying two drinks for Sleater and two drinks for himself, and Sleater, in turn, buying two drinks for Buchanan and two for himself.
XIII
That Fireman Sleater was on the negotiating term for the Union and was a witness at the arbitration proceedings.He was a key fireman.
XIV
Roger Buchanan was the neutral arbitrator and the one with ultimate responsibility in the award.
XV
On April 9, 1974, there was no permanent or final decision by the arbitrators.Drafts were still to be submitted by both Mr. Williams and Mr. Wilson, and there were some four later telephone conversations between the City arbitrator, Mr. Wilson, and Mr. Buchanan.
XVI
That while Mr. Buchanan states it is normal and accepted practice for a neutral arbitrator to drink and socialize with one of the parties to an arbitration award and that it makes no difference at which stage of proceedings arbitrations are at the time, this is astounding and contrary to the guidelines of the National Labor Relations Board.
XVII
That a few days later, a rumor arose that the Union had the arbitrator in its hip pocket, or words to this effect.That on...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Robel v. Roundup Corp.
... ... union representative, Ron Banka. According to Robel's ... 778, 788, 314 P.2d 672 (1957) ; see also Local Union 1296, Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. City f Kennewick, 86 Wash.2d 156, 161-62, 542 P.2d 1252 (1975) ... ...
-
Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. Washington State Human Rights Commission
... ... See Board of Education v. International Union of Operating Eng'rs, Local 68, 109 N.J.Super ... Paitakis v. City Council, 126 N.J.Super. 233, 237, 313 A.2d 804 ... They rely on Local Union 1296, Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. Kennewick, 86 ... ...
-
State v. Williams
... ... Firefighters Local 1296 v. Kennewick, 86 Wash.2d 156, 161, 542 ... ...
-
Robel v. Roundup Corp.
... ... The United Food and Commercial Workers union successfully challenged this action on behalf of ... Local Union 1296, Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. City f Kennewick, 86 Wash.2d 156, 161-62, 542 P.2d 1252 (1975); ... ...
-
§ 3.3 Evaluate an Appeal in Light of the Appellate Process
...after all, the function of the appellate court to determine the law. Union Local 1296, Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Kennewick, 86 Wn.2d 156, 542 P.2d 1252 (1975). This contrasting standard of review makes it important to distinguish between findings and conclusions. For a discussi......
-
Table of Cases
...rel. Dep't of Transp., 171 Wn.2d 54, 248 P.3d 83 (2011): 21.12(1)(c) Union Local 1296, Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Kennewick, 86 Wn.2d 156, 542 P.2d 1252 (1975): 3.3(4)(b)(ii) United Sav. & Loan Bank v. Pallis, 107 Wn. App. 398, 27 P.3d 629 (2001): 7.5(3), 20.10(3) Univ. of Wash.......