Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Portland, Me., v. Payne
Decision Date | 20 November 1900 |
Docket Number | 906. |
Citation | 105 F. 172 |
Parties | UNION MUT. LIFE INS. CO. OF PORTLAND, ME., v. PAYNE et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Felix H. Robertson, for plaintiff in error.
Robert B. Hazlewood and Cecil H. Smith, for defendants in error.
Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
On the 11th of July, 1893, the Union Mutual Life Insurance Company of Portland, Me., a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of Maine, issued a policy for $2,000 on the life of James B. Payne. The policy was payable to Myra A. Payne, the wife of the insured. James B. Payne died on December 23 1893. Myra A. Payne assigned an undivided one-half interest in the policy to R. R. Hazlewood and C. H. Smith. Myra A Payne and Hazlewood and Smith, citizens of the state of Texas, brought this action on the policy against the Union Mutual Life Insurance Company. The defendants filed an answer denying the averments of the petition, and alleging that the death of James B. Payne was caused by suicide. The answer showed also that the application for the insurance made by James B. Payne and Myra A. Payne contained the following statement: 'And that self-destruction, sane or insane within one year from the date of issue of policy are also risks not assumed by the company in the contract. ' The application was made a part of the contract of insurance. It was further stated in the answer that Myra A. Payne, in making the proof of the death of the insured, had made an affidavit that James B. Payne had committed suicide. The plaintiffs, in their replication, averred that, since Myra A. Payne had signed the proof of death, she had learned that the immediate cause of the death of James B. Payne was not suicide, but that he was assassinated, or that his death was the result of an accident, and that when Myra A. Payne signed the proofs of death she was in great trouble and distress on account of the death of her husband, and in feeble health, and that she signed the proofs of death without reading them. The case was tried on these issues. The plaintiffs offered in evidence the policy and the assignment of the undivided one-half interest. Myra A. Payne, as shown by the bill of exceptions, testified as follows:
''I reside in Waco, Texas. I knew James B. Payne. He was my husband. He is dead. He died in Waco, Texas, on the 23d day of December, 1893.' The witness being shown said insurance policy said she was the person named in said policy as beneficiary, and that the James B. Payne named as the person whose life was insured was her husband. She had by her husband three sons, respectively eleven, thirteen, and nineteen years of age, at death of J. B. Payne. He owned a ranch of one thousand acres in the country near Waco, and just before his death he was making plans to place his oldest son in charge of this ranch. The other two boys were in school. That he was very much devoted to his boys. She and her husband lived happily together, and never had any disagreement. That she never at any time said anything, or heard her husband say anything, or know anything in his life, that indicated any intention on his part to commit suicide, and that he had no reason to do so.'
On cross-examination Mrs. Payne said:
'(Being shown an affidavit signed by her, and sworn to before W. M. Sleeper, notary public of McLennan county, Tex., on the 15th of January, 1894, the witness declared the signature to said affidavit to be her genuine signature.)
On redirect examination Mrs. Payne testified:
The defendant company then offered in evidence the application for the insurance policy, signed by the insured, Payne, and his wife. It contained the stipulation as to suicide which has already been quoted. The defendant company then offered in evidence an affidavit or proof of death, signed by Myra A. Payne, dated January 15, 1894, which contained the following questions and answers:
Depositions of Myra A. Payne were in evidence, in which she testified:
The following is the statement made by Myra A. Payne before the coroner:
'(Signed) M. A. Payne.'
In reference to this statement Mrs. Payne testified:
The witness Mrs. Payne further testified:
The bill of exceptions states that 'other evidence' was introduced, but that it was not 'material to these exceptions.' There was a verdict and judgment on the policy against the insurance company.
The only questions before the court for decision are raised by the following four assignments of error.
'(1) The court erred in refusing to give the first special charge asked by the defendant, and being as follows, viz ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Prieto
...U. C. T., 232 F. 425, 427 (C. C. A. 4); Tabor v. Mutual Life Insurance Co., 13 F.(2d) 765, 770 (C. C. A. 4); Union Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Payne, 105 F. 172 (C. C. A. 5); National Union v. Fitzpatrick, 133 F. 694, 697 (C. C. A. 5); Metropolitan Insurance Co. v. Williamson, 174 F. 116 (......
-
Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. Prieto
... ... M. Miles, all of Union City, for defendant in ... EDWARD ... C. A. 4); ... Union Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Payne, 105 F. 172 ... (C. C. A. 5); National Union v ... R. A ... 538, 49 C. C. A. 309; Dennis v. Union Mut. L. Ins ... Co., 84 Cal. 570, 24 P. 120; Metropolitan ... ...
-
Phillips v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company
... ... Association v. Sargent, 142 U.S. 691; Ins. Co. v ... Wiswell, 56 Kan. 765; Ins. Co. v ... business. Hiatt v. Fraternal Union, 99 Mo.App. 105; ... In re St. Louis ... 399; ... Bacon on Benefit Societies and Life Insurance (3 Ed.), par ... 62; Angell and Ames ... ...
-
Moran v. Knights of Columbus
...Co., 20 F. 661; Keels v. Life Ass'n., 29 F. 198; Ins. Co. v. Naugle, 130 Ind. 79, 29 N.E. 393; Penfold v. Ins. Co., 85 N.Y. 317; Ins. Co. v. Payne, 105 F. 172; Co. Crayton, 70 N.E. 1066 [Ill.]; Ins. Co. v. Brignac, 36 So. 595; Ins. Co. v. Nicklas, 41 A. 906; Burnham v. Company, 75 N.W. 445 ......