Union Pac. R. Co. v. Gaede, 1953.

Decision Date28 March 1940
Docket NumberNo. 1953.,1953.
Citation110 F.2d 931
PartiesUNION PAC. R. CO. v. GAEDE.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

E. G. Knowles, of Denver, Colo. (T. W. Bockes, of Omaha, Neb., and Montgomery Dorsey and Hughes & Dorsey, all of Denver, Colo., on the brief), for appellant.

H. Gordon Howard, of Fort Collins, Colo., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, BRATTON, and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Mrs. Carrie Gaede brought this action against the Union Pacific Railroad Company to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of a crossing accident in Greeley, Colorado, on January 4, 1939. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the Railroad Company has appealed.

The facts are not in substantial dispute. On the evening of January 4, 1939, the plaintiff and her husband, Peter Gaede, were returning from the east side of Greeley, where they had attended church, to their home at 1013 First Street in Greeley. They were accompanied by one John Schneider. They were traveling in a 1929 Ford coupe. Gaede was driving, plaintiff was seated in the middle, and Schneider was seated on the right hand side. The Railroad Company's lines run north and south through Greeley. They are intersected by Fifth Street, which runs east and west. As the Gaedes and Schneider traveling westerly approached the Fifth Street crossing a freight train of the Railroad Company was approaching from the south about one block away. At this crossing there is a main line and two side tracks easterly from the main line. Certain freight cars, standing on the most easterly side track and on the south side of Fifth Street, obstructed the view of a person traveling westerly on Fifth Street until he reached a point between 30 and 40 feet east of the main line track. As Gaede approached the crossing he looked to the south. He was driving at a speed of about 15 miles per hour, but as he approached the crossing he slowed down to about 10 miles per hour. About the time he reached the main line track the motor stalled and stopped, but the momentum carried the coupe on to the main line track where it stopped. Schneider was able to get out of the car and travel a distance of between 5 and 10 feet before the collision. The front end of the freight train engine struck the coupe, causing severe injuries to plaintiff.

None of the occupants of the coupe heard any bell or whistle signal from the train. When the coupe approached the main line track the train was about one-half block away. Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Francen approached the crossing from the west and stopped to permit the freight train to pass in front of them. Both heard the whistle signal as they approached the crossing. Marguerite Orr, who lives at 713 Fifth Street, Greeley, heard the whistle signals for Fifth and Sixth Streets, Sixth Street being south of Fifth Street. The engineer of the head engine testified that the bell was ringing automatically when he left La Salle, south of Greeley, and that it was still ringing after the accident. He testified that he gave the whistle signals for Fifth and Sixth Streets. This testimony was corroborated by the fireman on the head engine, the head brakeman, and the engineer on the helper engine immediately behind the head engine.

The engineer on the head engine saw the Gaede coupe approach the crossing slowly and believed it was going to stop. The coupe moved on to the main line track and passed out of sight of the engineer. He believed it had time to pass over in safety. The train was traveling between 20 and 25 miles per hour. The nearest point that the engineer from his position in the cab could see the rails was about 75 feet ahead of the engine. The engine was about 50 to 60 feet from the coupe when it came to a stop on the main line track. The fireman, from his position on the left side of the cab, saw the coupe stop and called to the engineer to apply the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Vigil v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • August 3, 2007
    ...and surroundings that they were in position to hear and would probably have heard the sound had it been given. Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gaede, 10 Cir., 110 F.2d 931; Stephenson v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co., 7 Cir., 110 F.2d 401, 132 A.L.R. 455; Kilmer v. Norfolk & Western Railwa......
  • Hampton v. Wabash R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 8, 1947
    ... ... prevented the accident. McNeil v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., ... 182 S.W. 762; Armstrong v. Denver & R.G.R. Co., 195 ... 824; Bergman v ... Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 14 F.2d 580; Union Pacific v ... Gaede, 110 F.2d 931; Pere Marquette Ry. Co. v ... ...
  • Roth v. Swanson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • November 3, 1944
    ...Northern Pac. R. Co., 8 Cir., 14 F.2d 580, 581, 582; Pere Marquette R. Co. v. Anderson, 7 Cir., 29 F.2d 479, 480; Union Pacific R. Co. v. Gaede, 10 Cir., 110 F.2d 931, 933; Flagg v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 143 F.2d 90, 93; Krause v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. R. Co., 207 Minn. ......
  • Chicago & NW Ry. Co. v. Golay, 3195
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • July 2, 1946
    ...and surroundings that they were in position to hear and would probably have heard the sound had it been given. Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gaede, 10 Cir., 110 F.2d 931; Stephenson v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co., 7 Cir., 110 F.2d 401, 132 A.L.R. 455; Kilmer v. Norfolk & Western Railwa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT