Union Planters Bank v. Cchc

Decision Date24 March 2005
Docket NumberNo. 2004 CA 0871.,2004 CA 0871.
Citation907 So.2d 129
PartiesUNION PLANTERS BANK, National Association v. COMMERCIAL CAPITAL HOLDING CORPORATION, Patrick M. Haney, Mark M. Byouk, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa and American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court

Phillip W. Preis, Charles M. Gordon, Jr., Crystal D. Burkhalter, Baton Rouge, for Appellants, Commercial Capital Holding Corporation and Healthcare Capital Management, Inc.

Brent B. Barriere, New Orleans, H. Alston Johnson, III, Baton Rouge, for Appellees, State Farm Indemnity Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Mark D. Mese, Baton Rouge, for Appellee, Union Planters Bank, National Association.

George D. Fagan, Angelina Christina, New Orleans, for Appellees, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company.

David S. Rubin, Baton Rouge, for Appellee, Postlethwaite & Netterville (APAC).

Patrick W. Gray, Lafayette, for Appellees, Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company and The Prudential Property and Casualty New Jersey Holdings, Inc.

Robert J. Young, III, Metairie, for Appellees, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Ohio Casualty of New Jersey, Inc.

John B. Davis, II, Baton Rouge, for Appellee, New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company.

William E. Steffes, Gary K. McKenzie, Baton Rouge, for Appellees, Allstate Insurance Company and Allstate Indemnity Company.

Russell L. Dornier, Baton Rouge, for Appellee, Mark M. Byouk.

Before: CARTER, C.J., PETTIGREW, and MCDONALD, JJ.

CARTER, C.J.

This is an appeal of a trial court judgment sustaining a peremptory exception raising the objection of res judicata urged by State Farm Indemnity Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) in response to a third party demand brought by Commercial Capital Holding Corporation. The basis of the res judicata objection is a judgment rendered by a New Jersey court.

On the trial of the peremptory exception raising the objection of res judicata, the burden of proving the facts essential to sustaining the objection is on the party pleading the objection. Diamond B Const. Co., Inc. v. Department of Transp. and Development, 02-0573 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2/14/03), 845 So.2d 429, 435. When a party raises an objection of res judicata, the court must examine not only the pleadings but also the entire record in the first suit, to determine whether the second suit is, in fact, barred by res judicata. See Sewell v. Argonaut Southwest Ins. Co., 362 So.2d 758, 760 (La.1978).

Various parties, including State Farm, filed portions of the New Jersey suit record into the record as attachments to memoranda. However, the memoranda and attached exhibits were not introduced into evidence at the hearing on the objection.1 This court cannot consider exhibits filed into the record as an attachment to a memorandum in determining the issues on appeal. They are not evidence and are not properly part of the record on appeal. McKnight v. D & W Health Services, Inc., 02-2552 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/7/03), 873 So.2d 18, 24 n. 3. We note too that there is no provision in the law for this court to take judicial notice of a suit record from another court. See Louisiana Business College v. Crump, 474 So.2d 1366, 1369 (La.App. 2 Cir.1985).

It was incumbent on State Farm, as the party pleading the objection of res judicata, to introduce the New Jersey suit record into evidence at the trial court juncture of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
57 cases
  • Horrell v. Alltmont
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • July 31, 2020
    ......La. C.C.P. art. 966(D)(1) ; Neighbors Federal Credit Union v. Anderson, 2015-1020 (La. App. 1 Cir. 6/3/16), 196 So.3d 727, 734 (on a ...See Union Planters Bank v. Commercial Capital Holding Corp., 2004-0871 (La. App. 1 Cir. ......
  • Regions Bank & Regions Commercial Equip. Fin. v. Eymard
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • May 23, 2022
    ...332 So.3d 689, 691, citing Union Planters Bank v. Commercial Capital Holding Corporation. 2004-0871 (La.App. 1st Cir. 3/24/05), 907 So.2d 129, 130. Thus, in this matter, where no evidence was introduced at the hearing on the exception, we accept as true the facts alleged in the petitions an......
  • Gros v. STMG Lapeyre, LLC
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • May 6, 2015
    ...in determining the issues on appeal. Union Planters Bank v. Commercial Capital Holding Corp., 2004-0871 (La. App. 1st Cir. 3/24/05), 907 So.2d 129, 130. "They are not evidence and are not properly part of the record on appeal." Id. 6. Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 934 provides: ......
  • Regions Bank v. Eymard
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • May 23, 2022
    ......App. 1st Cir. 11/16/21), 332 So. 3d 689, 691, citing Union Planters Bank v. Commercial Capital Holding Corporation , 2004-0871 (La. App. 1st Cir. 3/24/05), ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT