Union Producing Co. v. Parkes
Decision Date | 23 December 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 123.,123. |
Citation | 40 F. Supp. 163 |
Parties | UNION PRODUCING CO. v. PARKES. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana |
Sholars & Gunby, and Frank O. Looney, all of Monroe, La., for plaintiff.
Oliver & Digby, of Monroe, La., for defendant.
Basing jurisdiction of this court upon diverse citizenship, plaintiff seeks, first, a declaratory judgment that it is the owner of the mineral rights under some fifty acres of land, unaffected by any question of prescription in the state law, and in the alternative (1) to recover damages in the sum of $7,222.22 with interest, and (2) a decree relieving it from the terms of a rental provision as to other lands and from the obligation to furnish gas to defendant at a named price.
Defendant filed pleas of prescription and of no cause of action, and subject thereto an answer to each article of the petition specifically. Thereafter, an amended petition was filed, as to which, by agreement these exceptions and motions are also to apply.
The plea of prescription is based upon Article 789 of the Louisiana Civil Code and the decisions of the state courts to the effect that any conveyance or reservation of an interest in the minerals vests only a servitude, apart from the fee, which is prescribed after a lapse of ten years, unless exercised or extended by express written agreement.
Counsel have stipulated the correctness of the contract sued upon, attached to and made part of the petition, that no drilling or other development has been had upon any of the property covered thereby; but that annually, since its execution, defendant has exercised the privilege of renting the cultivatable portion of the property described, other than the fifty acres upon which the mineral rights are involved here, and has likewise exercised an option to purchase gas for his domestic use at the price of five cents per thousand, all as provided in the contract.
The exception of no cause of action appears to be directed first, to the petition as a whole, and secondly, to the alternative demand.
The contract of conveyance is dated February 16, 1929, and the petition in this case was filed July 19, 1939, or some six months more than ten years after its execution. It conveyed a body of land of some four hundred acres in fee simple, and as to the property here involved, recited: "Less and except the following: Fifty (50) acres of land surrounding the residence now occupied by said vendor, which 50 acre tract is especially retained by vendor herein, and excepted from this sale, being more accurately described as follows:" (There then follows a long surveyor's technical description by metes and bounds of the fifty acres surrounding vendor's home and reserved as a home site.)
The following is further quoted therefrom: "b. Oil, Gas and Mineral Rights: All of the oil, gas and minerals lying and being in, on or under the following described land, to-wit: Fifty (50) acres of land surrounding the residence now occupied by said vendor, and more accurately described as follows:"
Other pertinent provisions are as follows:
* * * * *
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rodriguez v. Escambron Development Corp., 83-1439
...Acquisitive prescription represents in part a civil law policy in favor of simple titles. As the court stated in Union Producing Co. v. Parkes, 40 F.Supp. 163 (W.D.La.1940): "In order to insure simple and unentailed or uninvolved titles to real estate, it is the policy of [the civil] law, t......
-
Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Ayer Timber Co.
...before it accrued. Bodcaw Lumber Co. of Louisiana v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 1929, 167 La. 847, 120 So. 389. In Union Producing Co. v. Parkes, D.C.W.D.La.1940, 40 F.Supp. 163, a Court upheld our public policy by declaring a provision giving the purchaser of minerals 30 years to develop same......
-
COHORT ENER. v. CADDO-BOSSIER PARISHES PORT
...in instruments: Bodcaw Lumber Co. of Louisiana v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 1929, 167 La. 847, 120 So. 389; Union Producing Co. v. Parkes, D.C.W.D. La.1940, 40 F.Supp. 163; Vincent v. Bullock, 192 La. 1, 187 So. 35 5. Even though the Beauregard Parish School Board failed to reserve the minera......
-
Elkins v. Townsend, 18612.
...1947, 213 La. 183, 238, 34 So.2d 746, 764; Wemple v. Nabors Oil & Gas Company, 154 La. 483, 97 So. 666, 667; Union Producing Company v. Parkes, D.C., 40 F.Supp. 163, 166; United States v. Nebo Oil Company, 5 Cir., 190 F.2d 1003, 1007. And, the owner of the surface of the land can create a m......