Union Trust Co. v. Roth, (AC 18499)

Citation58 Conn. App. 481,755 A.2d 239
Decision Date27 June 2000
Docket Number(AC 18499)
CourtAppellate Court of Connecticut
PartiesUNION TRUST COMPANY v. BARBARA ROTH ET AL.

Schaller, Mihalakos and Dupont, Js.

Howard A. Lawrence and W. Bradley Morehouse filed a brief for the appellant (named defendant).

Matthew B. Woods filed a brief for the appellee (substitute plaintiff).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this mortgage foreclosure action, the owner of the equity of redemption appeals from the trial court's denial of her motion to reopen the judgment and to extend the sale date. Whether to grant a motion to open rests in the discretion of the trial court. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Stage Harbor Corp., 181 Conn. 141, 143, 434 A.2d 341 (1980). The court did not abuse its discretion in this case.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting a new sale date.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • First Ct. Capital v. Homes of Westport, 28991.
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • February 24, 2009
    ...75 (2003) (holding that court "properly denied" defendant's motion to open judgment of foreclosure by sale); Union Trust Co. v. Roth, 58 Conn. App. 481, 755 A.2d 239 (2000) (noting that "[w]hether to grant a motion to open rests in the discretion of the trial court" and holding that court d......
  • Citibank v. Lindland, 32723.
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • September 27, 2011
    ...to grant a motion to open [a judgment of foreclosure by sale] rests in the discretion of the trial court.” Union Trust Co. v. Roth, 58 Conn.App. 481, 481, 755 A.2d 239 (2000). The issue in this appeal, however, is whether the court properly determined that it had the authority to grant a mo......
  • Citibank, N.A. v. Lindland, AC 32723
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • September 27, 2011
    ...to grant a motion to open [a judgment of foreclosure by sale] rests in the discretion of the trial court.'' Union Trust Co. v. Roth, 58 Conn. App. 481, 481, 755 A.2d 239 (2000). The issue in this appeal, however, is whether the court properly determined that it had the authority to grant a ......
  • Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v. Russo, 35354.
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Connecticut
    • February 18, 2014
    ...quotation marks omitted.) Walton v. New Hartford, 223 Conn. 155, 169–70, 612 A.2d 1153 (1992); see also Union Trust Co. v. Roth, 58 Conn.App. 481, 481, 755 A.2d 239 (2000) (“[w]hether to grant a motion to open [a judgment of foreclosure by sale] rests in the discretion of the trial court”).......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT