Union Trust Co. v. Hawkins
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | MARSHALL, C.J. |
| Citation | Union Trust Co. v. Hawkins, 121 Ohio St. 159, 167 N.E. 389 (Ohio 1928) |
| Decision Date | 31 May 1928 |
| Docket Number | No 20680,20680 |
| Parties | The Union Trust Co. v. Hawkins, Admr. |
Trusts - Instrument testamentary in character, when - Owner's title not divested and transfer operative only at his death - Relinquishment of dominion over property, essential to common law trust - Trust agreement, reserving alteration or revocation, valid although not executed as will - Section 8617, General Code.
Where the owner of property executes to another an instrument under or in connection with which he does not divest himself of the title to any of his estate but provides for the disposition of such property at or after his death and it becomes operative to transfer the property only at the time and, by reason of his death, such instrument is testamentary in character.
At common law a trust instrument intended to operate as a
conveyance of property at and after the death of the sett]or must be consummated by such a distinct and absolute delivery of property by the settlor to the trustee for the benefit of the named beneficiaries as to be a relinquishment of dominion over it by the settlor.
The amendment of Section 8617, General Code, effective August 14 1921, authorizes a trust agreement, including the power to alter, amend or revoke the trust, and by virtue of that amendment a trust agreement making a transfer or conveyance of property including such power and to take effect at the death of the creator of the trust, will effect ouch transfer and conveyance, although the instrument be not executed in conformity with the law of wills.
Henry D. Hawkins, administrator of Catherine Hawkins, brought suit in the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county against the Union Trust Company to recover certain assets claimed to belong to the estate of Catherine Hawkins. A jury was waived and the cause tried to the court, resulting in judgment for the plaintiff, and thereupon the defendant company prosecuted error to the Court of Appeals, which court affirmed the judgment. The cause comes to this court on allowance of the motion to certify the record. This cause is before this court at this time upon a rehearing, the original disposition having been made May 31,1928. The controversy turns upon the legal effect of two written instruments, as follows: Original Agreement.
Supplemental Agreement.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting