United Elec. v. Iowa Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.
Decision Date | 17 May 2019 |
Docket Number | No. 18-0505,18-0505 |
Parties | UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, Appellee, and State of Iowa and Board of Regents, Intervenors-Appellees. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
This case requires us to interpret recent amendments to the Public Employment Relations Act limiting the mandatory subjects of collective bargaining and the matters an arbitrator may consider if the dispute enters binding arbitration. Under the 2017 amendments, when a bargaining unit does not have at least thirty percent public safety employees, bargaining is limited to "base wages and other matters mutually agreed upon." 2017 Iowa Acts ch. 2, § 6 (codified at Iowa Code § 20.9(1) (2018)). If such bargaining reaches impasse and the impasse persists, the dispute goes to binding arbitration, but the arbitrator may not consider "[p]ast collective bargaining agreements between the parties." Id. § 13 (codified at Iowa Code § 20.22(8)(b )(1) ).
Seeking to clarify the meaning of these provisions, a union sought a declaratory order from the Iowa Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) and then judicial review of the declaratory order. Both PERB and the district court ruled that "base wages" meant the "minimum (bottom) pay for a job classification, category or title, exclusive of additional pay such as bonuses, premium pay, merit pay, performance pay or longevity pay." In addition, both ruled that "past collective bargaining agreements" meant agreements that predate the current expiring agreement. The union appealed.
On appeal, we now hold that PERB and the district court correctly interpreted the 2017 amendments. In the abstract, terms like "base wages" and "past collective bargaining agreements" are ambiguous, but the context allows us to determine their meaning here. We conclude that "base wages" means the floor level of pay for each job before upward adjustments such as for job shift or longevity. The term "past collective bargaining agreements," in the context of a law that limits the arbitrator’s potential award to a certain percentage increase in base wages, Iowa Code § 20.22(10)(b )(1) (2018), allows the arbitrator to consider the existing collective bargaining agreement but not ones that came before. See id. § 20.22(8)(b )(1). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
The United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America (UE) is the parent of two local unions based in Iowa: UE Local 893/Iowa United Professionals and UE Local 896 (COGS). Both locals are certified by PERB to represent bargaining units of State of Iowa public employees. Local 896 represents a unit of graduate and professional students employed by the University of Iowa. Local 893 represents the science and social services units of state employees.
Iowa Code § 20.9 (2017). The 2017 amendments altered this duty for bargaining units that had less than thirty percent public safety employees to "base wages and other matters mutually agreed upon." 2017 Iowa Acts ch. 2, § 6 (codified at Iowa Code § 20.9 (2018) ) (emphasis added). Thus, for many public employees in Iowa, the only mandatory subject of collective bargaining became "base wages." The amendments did not define base wages.
In addition, if a collective bargaining negotiation stalled and binding arbitration was required, previous law required the arbitrator to consider "[p]ast collective bargaining contracts between the parties including the bargaining that led up to such contracts." Iowa Code § 20.22(7)(a ) (2017). In 2017, this was changed for bargaining units containing less than thirty percent public safety employees. Henceforth, the arbitrator would be prohibited from considering "[p]ast collective bargaining agreements between the parties or bargaining that led to such agreements." 2017 Iowa Acts ch. 2, § 13 (codified at Iowa Code § 20.22(8)(b )(1) (2018)). At the same time, the 2017 amendments required the arbitrator to "consider and specifically address in the arbitrator’s determination ... [c]omparison of base wages, hours, and conditions of employment of the involved public employees with those of other public employees doing comparable work ...." Id. (codified at Iowa Code § 20.22(8)(a )(1) ). Additionally, the following qualification was added for bargaining units containing less than thirty percent public safety employees:
Id. § 12 (codified at Iowa Code § 20.22(10)(b )(1)(a)–(b) ).
On April 21, approximately two months after House File 291 became law, UE petitioned for a declaratory order from PERB. UE sought a declaration on whether four proposals constituted mandatory, permissive, or prohibited subjects of bargaining. UE also asked a fifth question concerning the authority of an arbitrator to consider wage levels under the existing, expiring collective bargaining agreement.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Service Employees International Union, Local 199 v. Iowa Board of Regents
...refusing to defer here is consistent with the majority opinion released today in United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America v. Iowa Public Employment Relations Board , 928 N.W.2d 101 (Iowa 2019). There, the majority holds that it would not employ the express delegation theory to ......
-
In re Interest of H.W.
...at 384. So we must adopt it. See Iowa Code § 232.1 ; A.M. , 856 N.W.2d at 373 ; see also United Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers of Am. v. Iowa Pub. Emp. Rels. Bd. , 928 N.W.2d 101, 110 (Iowa 2019) ("When the legislature issues this kind of directive on statutory interpretation, it binds us.").......
-
Borst Bros. Constr., Inc. v. Fin. of Am. Commercial, LLC
...clear, we do not search for legislative intent beyond the express terms of the statute.’ " United Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers of Am. v. Iowa Pub. Emp't Rels. Bd. , 928 N.W.2d 101, 109 (Iowa 2019) (citation omitted) (quoting State v. Pub. Emp. Rels. Bd. , 744 N.W.2d 357, 360–61 (Iowa 2008) ......
-
Calcaterra v. Iowa Bd. of Med.
...in its proper context is unambiguous, we do not look past the plain meaning of the words. United Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers of Am. v. Iowa Pub. Emp. Rels. Bd. , 928 N.W.2d 101, 109 (Iowa 2019)."Statutes need to be read as a whole, both in initially determining whether ambiguity exists and......