United States Burnett v. Teller
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | WOODS |
| Citation | 27 L.Ed. 352,2 S.Ct. 39,107 U.S. 64 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES ex rel. BURNETT v. TELLER, Secretary of the Interior |
| Decision Date | 29 January 1883 |
By an act passed March 3, 1873, entitled 'An act to revise, consolidate, and amend the pension laws,' (17 St. 569, § 4; Rev. St. § 4698,) it was provided that from and after June 4, 1872, all persons entitled by law to a less pension than thereinafter specified, who, while in the military or naval service of the United States and in the line of duty, had been so permanently and totally disabled as to render them utterly helpless, or so nearly so as to require the regular personal attendance of another person, should be entitled to a pension of $31.25 per month. Afterwards, by an act passed June 18, 1874, a pension of $50 per month was granted to the persons described in the act of March 3, 1873, in lieu of the pension of $31.25 granted by that act. By an act approved June 16, 1880, it was provided as follows:
'All soldiers and sailors * * * who are now receiving the pension of $50 per month,' under the act last aforesaid, 'shall receive, in lieu of all pensions now paid them by the government of the United States, and there shall be paid to them, in the same manner as pensions are now paid to such persons, the sum of $72 per month.' The act further declared 'that all pensioners whose pensions shall be increased by the provisions of this act from $50 per month to $72 per month, shall be paid the difference between said sums monthly, from June 17, 1878, to the time of the taking effect of this act.'
Prior to the passage of the last-mentioned act congress had passed an act, which was approved March 3, 1879, 'granting an increase of pension to Ward B. Burnett,' which was as follows:
'That the secretary of the interior be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to place on the pension roll the name of Ward B. Burnett, and pay him a pension of $50
Page 65
per month in lieu of the pension he now receives; but nothing in this act contained shall entitle the said Ward B. Burnett to arrears of pension.' 20 St. 665.
On October 20, 1882, Ward B. Burnett, the person named in the special act above mentioned, filed in the supreme court of the District of Columbia, as relator, in the name of the United States, a petition against Henry M. Teller, secretary of the department of the interior, in which he recited the foregoing legislation of congress, and averred that he was a survivor of the war with Mexico, and other wars, of which he was an officer in the army of the United States; that he was wounded at the battle of Cherubusco on August 24, 1847; that for wounds received in battle he was granted, under a general pension law of congress, a pension at the rate of $30 per month, which he received from August 1, 1848, until March 3, 1879; that under the special act of the date last mentioned a pension certificate, dated June 6, 1879, signed by the secretary of the interior and countersigned by the commissioner of pensions, was ecuted and delivered to him, on which he was paid from March 3, 1879, to June 4, 1882, a pension at the rate of $50 per month.
The petition further alleged that the relator had applied to the commissioner of pensions to be paid the increased rates of pension authorized by the said...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, Civ. A. No. SA72CA271.
...658 (1857) holding that Revolutionary War pensions were in the nature of a "bounty"; see also, United States ex rel. Burnett v. Teller, 107 U.S. 64, 2 S.Ct. 39, 27 L.Ed. 352 (1882) (Mexican War Pensions); Frisbie v. United States, 157 U.S. 160, 166, 15 S.Ct. 586, 39 L.Ed. 657 (1895) (Civil ......
-
De Rodulfa v. United States, No. 22947
...S.Ct. 200, 66 L.Ed. 350 (1922); Frisbie v. United States, 157 U.S. 160, 166, 15 S.Ct. 586, 39 L.Ed. 657 (1895); United States v. Teller, 107 U.S. 64, 68, 2 S.Ct. 39, 27 L.Ed. 352 103 See Goldberg v. Kelly, supra note 85, 397 U.S. at 261-264, 90 S.Ct. 1011, 30 L. Ed.2d 231. 104 United States......
-
Lynch v. United States Wilner v. Same, Nos. 855
...The benefits conferred by gratuities may be redistributed or withdrawn at any time in the discretion of Congress. United States v. Teller, 107 U.S. 64, 68, 2 S.Ct. 39, 27 L.Ed. 352; Frisbie v. United States, 157 U.S. 160, 166, 15 S.Ct. 586, 39 L.Ed. 657; United States v. Cook, 257 U.S. 523,......
-
Taylor v. Board of Ed. of Cabell County, No. 12733
...States, 157 U.S. 160, 15 S.Ct. 586, 39 L.Ed. 657; Pennie v. Reis, 132 U.S. 464, 10 S.Ct. 149, 33 L.Ed. 426; United States v. Teller, 107 U.S. 64, 2 S.Ct. 39, 27 L.Ed. 352; MacFarland v. Bieber, 32 App.D.C. 513; Raines v. Board of Trustees of Illinois State Teachers' Pension and Retirement F......
-
Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, Civ. A. No. SA72CA271.
...658 (1857) holding that Revolutionary War pensions were in the nature of a "bounty"; see also, United States ex rel. Burnett v. Teller, 107 U.S. 64, 2 S.Ct. 39, 27 L.Ed. 352 (1882) (Mexican War Pensions); Frisbie v. United States, 157 U.S. 160, 166, 15 S.Ct. 586, 39 L.Ed. 657 (1895) (Civil ......
-
Taylor v. Board of Ed. of Cabell County, No. 12733
...States, 157 U.S. 160, 15 S.Ct. 586, 39 L.Ed. 657; Pennie v. Reis, 132 U.S. 464, 10 S.Ct. 149, 33 L.Ed. 426; United States v. Teller, 107 U.S. 64, 2 S.Ct. 39, 27 L.Ed. 352; MacFarland v. Bieber, 32 App.D.C. 513; Raines v. Board of Trustees of Illinois State Teachers' Pension and Retirement F......
-
Talbott v. Indep. Sch. Dist. of Des Moines, No. 45629.
...payment of which might be given or withheld at pleasure. Walton v. Cotton, 19 How. 355, 60 U.S. 355, 15 L.Ed. 658;United States v. Teller, 107 U.S. 64, 2 S.Ct. 39, 27 L.Ed. 352;People ex rel. Donovan, v. Retirement Board, etc., 326 Ill. 579, 158 N.E. 220, 54 A.L.R. 940;State ex rel. Drage v......
-
Talbott v. Independent School Dist. of Des Moines, 45629.
...of which might be given or withheld at pleasure. Walton v. Cotton, 19 How. 355, 60 U.S. 355, 15 L.Ed. 658; United States v. Teller, 107 U.S. 64, 2 S.Ct. 39, 27 L.Ed. 352; People ex rel. Donovan, v. Retirement Board, etc., 326 Ill. 579, 158 N.E. 220, 54 A.L.R. 940; State ex rel. Drage v. Jon......