United States ex rel. Barilla v. Uhl

Decision Date22 May 1939
Citation27 F. Supp. 746
PartiesUNITED STATES ex rel. BARILLA v. UHL, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at Port of New York.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Milton J. Meltzer, of New York City, for relator.

John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Clifford H. Rich, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

CONGER, District Judge.

The relator has been ordered deported under the provisions of Section 19 of the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917, 8 U.S.C.A. § 155, in that he, an alien, has been sentenced subsequent to May 1, 1917 to imprisonment more than twice for a term of one year or more for the commission subsequent to entry, of a crime involving moral turpitude; to wit, assault second degree and assault second degree.

The relator had two hearings, one on November 17, 1936 and the other on November 26, 1936, both conducted at Auburn State Prison where the relator was incarcerated.

The testimony taken on said hearings showed that the relator was born in Italy; that he came to the United States when very young; that he had departed from the United States on several occasions; that he again entered the United States when he was thirteen years of age and again on April 16, 1917; that on this last entry, he was returning from a short visit to Curacoa where he had gone for a vacation.

That he last entered the United States when he was returning from overseas service in the United States Army where he had been serving during the World War.

That on June 13, 1930 he was convicted in the County Court of Kings County, New York, and pleaded guilty to the crime of assault in the second degree and sentenced to the New York State prison at Sing Sing for a term of not less than two and one-half years or more than five years.

That on the 13th day of November, 1935 in the County Court of Bronx County, relator was convicted of the crime of assault in the second degree and sentenced to a state prison for a term of five years.

If the relator is an alien, there can be no doubt that there is ground for deportation under Section 19 of the Immigration Act of 1917.

The relator claims, however, that he is a citizen and, therefore, that he is not subject to deportation, or at least under his claim of citizenship, he is entitled to a judicial inquiry upon the issue of his citizenship.

The relator's contention is that while he was serving in the United States Army overseas, he became a citizen pursuant to Title 8 U.S.C.A. § 390.

The references I find in the record prior to the order of deportation are as follows: On May 13, 1936 at Auburn Prison, when examined by an immigration officer, he made the following claim:

"Q. Of what country are you a citizen? A. United States.

"Q. On what do you base your claim to United States citizenship? A. I was sworn in as a citizen of the United States in France after the Armistice was signed. I served in the United States Army."

The relator then gave the details of his overseas service which he said was from April 13, 1917 to June 4, 1919. He further stated that he had no naturalization certificate.

Again, at the hearing on November 17, 1936, the relator stated in response to a question, as follows: "A. I will stand pat on my rights...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • United States v. Rangel-Perez
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • December 9, 1959
    ...F.2d 472, 473; Vlisidis v. Holland, 3 Cir., 1957, 245 F.2d 812 affirming D.C.E. D.Pa.1957, 150 F.Supp. 678; United States ex rel. Barilla v. Uhl, D.C.S.D.N. Y.1939, 27 F.Supp. 746, affirmed 2 Cir., 1940, 108 F.2d 1021; United States ex rel. Tomasso v. Flynn, D.C.W.D.N.Y. 1927, 22 F.2d 174; ......
  • Gorsira v. Loy
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • February 16, 2005
    ...Fabregas v. INS, 107 Fed.Appx. 249, 250, 2004 WL 1842773, at *1 (2d Cir. Aug.17, 2004) (citing United States ex rel. Barilla v. Uhl, 27 F.Supp. 746, 746-47 (S.D.N.Y.1939), aff'd per curiam, 108 F.2d 1021 (2d Cir.1940));7 Bernardo v. United States of America, 2004 WL 741287, at *2 (N.D.Tex. ......
  • Corona-Palomera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • November 19, 1981
    ...that the person so born is an alien, United States ex rel. Rongetti v. Neelly, 207 F.2d 281, 284 (7th Cir. 1953); Barilla v. Uhl, 27 F.Supp. 746 (S.D.N.Y.1939), affd per curiam 108 F.2d 1021 (2d Cir. 1940); Minneapolis v. Reum, 56 F. 576 (8th Cir. 1893); (see also Matter of Tijerina-Villarr......
  • Ligi v. Regnery Gateway, Inc., CV-88-0224.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • June 24, 1988
    ...present. Hauenstein v. Lynham, 100 U.S. (10 Otto) 483, 25 L.Ed. 628 (1879); United States, Barilla v. UHL, District Director of Immigration & Naturalization at Port of New York, 27 F.Supp. 746, 747 (S.D.N.Y. 1939). Absent sufficient evidence to the contrary, Buhoiu's Romanian citizenship, e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT