United States ex rel. Fink v. Heyd, 26769.
| Decision Date | 07 March 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 26769.,26769. |
| Citation | 408 F.2d 7 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES ex rel. Stephen FINK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louis HEYD, Criminal Sheriff of the Parish of Orleans, Respondent-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Ross T. Scaccia, New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Numa V. Bertel, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Jim Garrison, Dist. Atty., for Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, La., for appellee.
Before THORNBERRY and DYER, Circuit Judges, and FISHER, District Judge.
Petitioner, who is in the process of appealing his state conviction for a narcotics violation, seeks a declaration from a federal court sitting in habeas corpus that a state statute which operates to deny him bail pending appeal is unconstitutional. He was sentenced to five years' imprisonment by the state trial court and is therefore ineligible for bail pending appeal by operation of article 314 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure and article I, section 12 of the Louisiana Constitution which prohibit a defendant who is sentenced to a term of five years or more from making an appeal bond.
This Court has held that inasmuch as there is no absolute right to bail pending appeal it will not interfere with a state statute providing for bail under certain circumstances unless the legislation violates fundamental constitutional principles. Sellers v. Georgia, 5th Cir. 1967, 374 F.2d 84. In this case, we agree with the court below, 287 F. Supp. 716 that a determination by the state legislature that any defendant who has been sentenced to five years' imprisonment or more is such a poor bail risk that he should be prohibited from making an appeal bond is not so arbitrary and unreasonable as to contravene the fourteenth amendment. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Hazzard
...ex rel. Goodman v. Kehl, 456 F.2d 863 (2d Cir.1972), and United States ex rel. Fink v. Heyd, 287 F.Supp. 716 (E.D.La.1968), aff'd, 408 F.2d 7 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 895, 90 S.Ct. 192, 24 L.Ed.2d 172 (1969), all imply at most that bail cannot be denied irrationally or arbitrarily......
-
Pisano v. Shillinger
...Cir.1970); In re Whitney, 421 F.2d 337 (1st Cir.1970); United States ex rel. Fink v. Heyd, 287 F.Supp. 716 (E.D.La.1968), aff'd, 408 F.2d 7 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 895, 90 S.Ct. 192, 24 L.Ed.2d 172 (1969); Genung At best, as the foregoing cases establish, the authority to gra......
-
Huihui v. Shimoda
...1926); United States ex rel. Covington v. Coparo, supra; United States ex rel. Fink v. Heyd, 287 F.Supp. 716 (E.D.La.1968), aff'd, 408 F.2d 7 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 895, 90 S.Ct. 192, 24 L.Ed.2d 172 (1969); Wansley v. Wilkerson, 263 F.Supp. 54 (W.D.Va.1967); accord, Martin ......
-
Gallie v. Wainwright
...See also Hamilton v. New Mexico, 479 F.2d 343 (10th Cir. 1973); Bloss v. Michigan, 421 F.2d 903 (6th Cir. 1970); United States ex rel. Fink v. Heyd, 408 F.2d 7 (5th Cir. 1969). In any event, we have previously considered and rejected both of these contentions in Greene v. State, 238 So.2d 2......