United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rochester

Citation283 S.W. 135
Decision Date07 April 1926
Docket Number(No. 14585.)
PartiesUNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. v. Mrs. W. C. ROCHESTER et al.
CourtSupreme Court of Texas

Seay, Seay, Malone & Lipscomb, of Dallas, and Wantland, Dickey & Glasgow, of Henrietta, for applicant.

PER CURIAM.

This case was rightly decided by the Court of Civil Appeals (281 S. W. 306) under the principle announced in the opinion of this court in the case of Cassell et al. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (Tex. Sup.) 283 S. W. 127, this day determined.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Kramer Service, Inc. v. Wilkins
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 20, 1939
    ... ... R. Co. v ... McGowan, 62 Miss. 682; Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust ... Co. v. Silver Saver Stores, Inc., 148 ... 217, 170 Miss. 834; U.S. F. & G. Co ... v. Rochester, 281 S.W. 306, 283 S.W. 135; Tucker v ... Gurley, 175 ... with almost all of the other common-law states. Nearly a half ... century ago, when our Court stood forth ... ...
  • City of Austin v. Johnson, 9538.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 1946
    ...within his view or knowledge, but may also testify as to his opinion respecting a given state of facts. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Rochester, Tex. Civ.App., 281 S.W. 306, affirmed 115 Texas 404, 283 S.W. The fact that Higgins could not or did not see the electricity enter the ......
  • Schroeder v. Brandon, 8084.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 23, 1943
    ...abused his discretion. Our reasons for the conclusion stated may be well summarized in the following excerpt (U. S. F. & G. Co. v. Rochester, Tex.Civ.App., 281 S.W. 306, 313, affirmed 115 Tex. 404, 283 S.W. 135), Chief Justice Conner speaking for the court: "We see nothing in all this that ......
  • Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Preslar
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • June 24, 1927
    ...in but one case called to our attention, and that is the case of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Rochester (Tex. Civ. App). 281 S. W. 306. This decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court by memorandum opinion in 115 Tex. 404, 283 S. W. 135, on the ground that the decision is co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT