United States Mexican Oil Corporation v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 341.
| Decision Date | 06 June 1927 |
| Docket Number | No. 341.,341. |
| Citation | 20 F.2d 385 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES MEXICAN OIL CORPORATION v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Burlingham, Veeder, Masten & Fearey, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and A. Howard Neely, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Barry, Wainwright, Thacher & Symmers, of New York City (Earle Farwell, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
The vessel Pearldon was stranded on January 13, 1921, on a shoal near Shooter's Island off Newark Bay. Appellant's tug No. 32 is held responsible therefor, jointly with the Pearldon, and this appeal seeks to review that decree.
The cause of stranding was found to be due to the No. 32 permitting her tow to swing up into Newark Bay so that it was across the course of the Pearldon and crowded her on the rocks at Bergen Point, while she was attempting to navigate clear of the tow. The Pearldon was also held at fault, but no appeal is taken, and we are not now urged to exonerate her from fault. Appellant's argument is that the Pearldon was not crowded over on the rocks as claimed; also that, if she was crowded, it was not the tow of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company No. 32, but the tow of another party. While the rule, so often stated, is applicable here — that we will accept the conclusion of the trial judge as to the findings of fact, unless certainty of error can be found (The Perry Setzer C. C. A. 299 F. 587; Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. Campbell C. C. A. 8 F.2d 223; The Bern C. C. A. 261 F. 996) — still we have examined this record, because of the earnest plea of counsel that there is error. The tug and vessel passed each other at the Red and Black Obstruction Buoy. The Pearldon grounded on Bergen Point. When she struck the rocks, the evidence clearly shows that the No. 32 was about abreast of the Pearldon. A tug was made fast to the port bow of the Pearldon, and her master gave ample evidence of the occurrences, and the No. 32 was sufficiently identified. That the Pearldon struck the bottom off Bergen Point is established beyond reasonable dispute. It was also proved that it was impossible for the Pearldon to keep in the deep channel, because the No. 32 and her barges were sagging up to the northward. It is also established that they met in this passage at the Red and Black Buoy.
The claim that the tide alone caused the Pearldon to go over on the rocks is unsupported by the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Bulldog Trucking, Inc.
... ... re BULLDOG TRUCKING, INC., a Delaware Corporation, f/d/b/a Bulldog Trucking of Georgia, Inc., ... E.I. DU PONT de NEMOURS & CO., Defendant ... No. C-B-90-31936. Adv. No. 3100 ... United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, ... ...
-
In re Olympia Holding Corp.
... ... In re OLYMPIA HOLDING CORPORATION, et al., Debtors ... Lloyd T. WHITAKER, as ... 92-825-Civ-J-16, 93-1-MV-J-16 ... United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville ... at 2765-2766; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Maxwell, 237 U.S. 94, 97, 35 S.Ct. 494, 495, ... ...
-
Petterson Lighterage & T. Corp. v. New York Central R. Co.
...F. 469; Donovan v. New York Trap Rock Co., 2 Cir., 271 F. 308; The Perry Setzer, 2 Cir., 299 F. 586; United States Mexican Oil Corporation v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 2 Cir., 20 F.2d 385; The James McWilliams, 2 Cir., 42 F.2d 130; The Cullen No. 32, 2 Cir., 62 F.2d 68. And when the question cam......
-
Johnson v. Cooper
...F. 469; Donovan v. New York Trap Rock Co., 2 Cir., 271 F. 308; The Perry Setzer, 2 Cir., 299 F. 586; United States Mexican Oil Corporation v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 2 Cir., 20 F.2d 385; The James McWilliams, 2 Cir., 42 F.2d 130; The Cullen No. 32, 2 Cir., 62 F.2d 68. And when the question cam......