United States of America v. Baltimore Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company

Decision Date11 November 1912
Docket NumberNo. 648,648
Citation226 U.S. 14,33 S.Ct. 5,57 L.Ed. 104
PartiesUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Cincinnati & Columbus Traction Company, and Interstate Commerce Commission, Appts., v. BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY and Norfolk & Western Railway Company
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Assistant Attorney General Denison, Special Assistant Attorney General Thurlow M. Gordon, and Messrs. Charles W. Needham for appellants.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 15-17 intentionally omitted] Messrs. R. Walton Moore, Edward Barton, Theodore W. Reath, Joseph I. Doran, and F. Markoe Rivinus, for appellees.

Mr. C. B. Matthews, for appellants.

Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a suit to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, directing the appellees to establish switch connections with the road of the appellant, and also through routes to and from points on that road. 20 Inters. Com. Rep. 486. The commerce court made a decree as prayed (195 Fed. 962), and an appeal was taken to this court. The facts material to our decision are as follows: The Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad and the Norfolk & Western Railway are trunk lines of steam railroads running east and west across the state of Ohio. After almost touching each other at Norwood, a suburb of Cincinnati, they draw apart, the former in a northerly, the latter in a southerly, direction, but come together again at Hillsboro, about 53 miles further to the east. The line of the Traction Company is an 'interurban' electric railway, for passengers and some freight, running under a state charter between Norwood and Hillsboro, through the middle of the diamond inclosed by the steam roads, and authorized to go on to Columbus. For a number of miles easterly from Norwood to Stonelick, near Boston, the last-mentioned road is very near and almost parallel to the tracks of one or the other of the steam roads, as it is again for the last 5 miles before reaching Hillsboro. In the intervening space, between Boston and Dodsonville, the towns and villages on the electric line are from 5 to 10 or 12 miles by wagon distant from the nearest station on one of the steam roads. The Traction Company applied to the Commission for switch connections, and they were ordered as we have said.

Some technical objections were raised, but the substantial question is whether the Traction Company is a 'lateral branch line of railroad' within the meaning of the 1st section of the act to regulate commerce, amended by act of June 18, 1910, chap. 309, § 7, 36 Stat. at L. 539, 547. That section requires carriers subject to the act to establish switch connections with such lines on certain conditions; and, as amended, permits owners of such lines as well as shippers to make complaint to the Commission in case of the carriers' failure upon written application, and authorizes the Commission to hear, investigate, and determine whether the conditions exist, and to make an order directing the carrier to comply with the act. It will be seen without much argument that, unless the ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
45 cases
  • Whitfield v. Hanges
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 22 Marzo 1915
    ... ... v. HANGES et al. No. 4175. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. March ... the Louisville & Nashville Railroad case at page 93 are apt, ... persuasive, and ... United ... States v. Baltimore & Ohio S.W.R.R., 226 U.S. 14, 33 ... Sup.Ct. 5, ... ...
  • Sanders Bros. Radio Station v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COM'N
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 23 Enero 1939
    ...1382. 15 Morgan v. United States, 304 U.S. 1, 14, 15, 58 S.Ct. 773, 999, 82 L.Ed. 1129. 16 See United States v. Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern R. Co., 226 U.S. 14, 20, 33 S.Ct. 5, 57 L.Ed. 104. 17 265 U.S. 274, 44 S.Ct. 565, 68 L.Ed. 1016. 18 United States v. Abilene & Southern R. Co., 265......
  • The Chicago Junction Case Baltimore Co v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 3 Marzo 1924
    ...U. S. 591, 600, 42 Sup. Ct. 239, 66 L. Ed. 385. (3) Switching connections, section 1, par. 9, United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Ry. Co., 226 U. S. 14, 33 Sup. Ct. 5, 57 L. Ed. 104. (4) Division of joint rates, section 15, par. 6, compare The New England Divisions Case, 261 U. S......
  • State ex rel. St. Louis County v. Evans
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 7 Mayo 1940
    ... ... entire railroad systems controlled by them, rather than ... Cyclopedia of Corps., sec. 45, p. 63; United" States v. Elgin, ... 298 U.S. 492 ...     \xC2" ... the St. Louis Terminal Railway Company and the St. Louis Belt & Terminal Railway ... 10011, 10012; ... United States v. Baltimore, etc., Ry. Co., 226 U.S ... 14, 57 L.Ed. 104, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT