United States v. 21 Lbs. 8 Oz. More or Less of Platinum, Civ. No. 2026.
Decision Date | 14 January 1944 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 2026. |
Citation | 53 F. Supp. 971 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. 21 LBS. 8 OZ. MORE OR LESS OF PLATINUM. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland |
Bernard J. Flynn, U. S. Atty., of Baltimore, Md., for U. S.
William Curran, of Baltimore, Md., for claimant.
This case is before the court on petition of Juan Tomas Bareno for restoration of a certain quantity of platinum, filed pursuant to Section 403 of Title 22 U.S.C.A. which is part of the Espionage Act of June 15th, 1917, 40 Stat. 217, 223.
In order that Section 403 may be properly understood it is appropriate to quote not merely that Section but also Sections 401, 402, 404 and 405 of the same Act, as follows:
Sec. 403: "The owner or claimant of any property seized under sections 401-408 of this title may, at any time before condemnation proceedings have been instituted, as provided in sections 404-408 of this title, file his petition for its restoration in the district court of the United States, or the district court of the Canal Zone, or the court of first instance in the Philippine Islands, having jurisdiction over the place in which the seizure was made, whereupon the court shall advance the cause for hearing and determination with all possible dispatch, and, after causing notice to be given to the United States attorney for the district and to the person making the seizure, shall proceed to hear and decide whether the property seized shall be restored to the petitioner or forfeited to the United States."
Sec. 404: "Whenever the person making any seizure under sections 401-408 of this title applies for and obtains a warrant for the detention of the property, and (a) upon the hearing and determination of the petition of the owner or claimant restoration is denied, or (b) the owner or claimant fails to file a petition for restoration within thirty days after the seizure, the United States attorney for the district wherein it was seized, upon direction of the Attorney General, shall institute libel proceedings in the United States district court or the district court of the Canal Zone or the court of first instance of the Philippine Islands having jurisdiction over the place wherein the seizure was made against the property for condemnation; and if, after trial and hearing of the issues involved, the property is condemned, it shall be disposed of by sale, and the proceeds thereof, less the legal costs and charges, paid into the Treasury: Provided, That the court shall order any arms and munitions of war so condemned delivered to the War Department of the United States."
Sec. 405: "The proceedings in such summary trials upon the petition of the owner or claimant of the property seized, as well as in the libel cases provided for in section 404 of this title, shall conform, as near as may be, to the proceedings in admiralty, except that either party may demand trial by jury of any issue of fact joined in such libel cases and all such proceedings shall be at the suit of and in the name of the United States: Provided, That upon the payment of the costs and legal expenses of both the summary trials and the libel proceedings provided for in section 404 of this title, and the execution and delivery of a good and sufficient bond in an amount double the value of the property seized, conditioned that it will not be exported or used or employed contrary to the provisions of sections 401-408 of this title, the court, in its discretion, may direct that it be delivered to the owners thereof or to the claimants thereof."
The Government denies claimant's right to restoration of the platinum for reasons that will be hereinafter stated. The material facts in the case, which have been stipulated, are as follows:
On or about October 6, 1942, agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested five persons, including the present claimant, engaged in an attempt to export some twenty one pounds of platinum from the Port of Baltimore, on board the Steamship Motomar, in violation of Section 701 of Title 50 U.S.C.Appendix, and the Presidential Proclamations and Executive Orders issued thereunder, prohibiting the exportation of platinum without a license. At the same time the platinum, found concealed aboard the vessel, was seized by the agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The statute just referred to, commonly known as the Export Control Law, was enacted as Section 6 of the War Powers Act of July 2, 1940, Chapter 508, and is as follows:
On January 19, 1943, all five persons, including the present claimant, were indicted in this district, for violating the requirements of Section 801.2 as amended, and Section 801.7 of the General Regulations of the Board of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. 21 POUNDS, 8 OUNCES, OF PLATINUM, 5265.
...States can rely in this case is the Espionage Act and the conditions thereof have not been met. In this connection the court said 53 F.Supp. 971, 975: "* * * unless we are to ignore the mandatory requirement of Sections 401, 402, with respect to the time after the seizure within which the w......
-
United States v. Morachis
... ... United States v. 21 Lbs. 8 Oz. More or Less of Platinum, D ... ...
-
United States v. One Cadillac Coupe, Civil Actions No. 202
... ... (b) Three Cadillac coupes, more" particularly hereinafter described; and, ... \xC2" ... On December 8, 1942, a warrant for the further detention of the ... 217; United States v. 21 lbs. 8 ozs. more or less, of Platinum, D. C., 53 ... ...
-
United States v. 200 WATCHES
... ... United States v. 21 Pounds, 8 Ounces, of Platinum, 4 Cir., 1945, 147 ... 21 Pounds, 8 Ounces More or Less of Platinum, D.C.D. Md., 1944, 53 F.Supp ... ...