United States v. 74.57 Acres of Land, More or Less, CIVIL ACTION 12-0239-WS-N

CourtUnited States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Southern District of Alabama
Writing for the CourtWILLIAM H. STEELE
PartiesUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 74.57 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, et al., Defendants.
Docket NumberCIVIL ACTION 12-0239-WS-N
Decision Date11 April 2012

74.57 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, et al., Defendants.



Dated: April 11, 2012


This newly filed matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's Motion to Deposit Funds (doc. 4) and Motion for Ex Parte Order for Delivery of Immediate Possession (doc. 5).

I. Background.

On April 6, 2012, the United States filed a Complaint in Condemnation (doc. 1) seeking to effectuate the taking of certain property under the power of eminent domain and the award of just compensation to owners and parties in interest.1 The real property in question is two adjacent parcels located in Conecuh County, Alabama, the first consisting of 33.25 acres of land, more or less, and the second consisting of 41.32 acres of land, more or less. The Government proposes to take fee simple title of the 33.25-acre tract (subject to existing easements of record for public utilities, drainage and so on), and to take a permanent restrictive easement as to the 41.32-acre tract to impose stringent limits on the use and development of such property by its owners. Although the final figures are ultimately for the Court to decide in these proceedings, the pleadings reflect that estimated just compensation for these takings is $46,024 for the smaller parcel and $107,802 for the larger parcel. The Government's stated purpose for taking these

Page 2

parcels is to facilitate the Secretary of the Navy's extension of runways and acquisition of clear zones at Middleton Field, a Naval Outlying Landing Field in Evergreen, Alabama.

Contemporaneously with the Complaint, the Government filed a Declaration of Taking (doc. 2), Motion to Deposit Funds (doc. 4), and Motion for Ex Parte Order for Delivery of Immediate Possession (doc. 5).2 With respect to the Motion to Deposit Funds, the Government seeks leave to deposit with the Clerk of Court the amount of $153,826.00, which equals the combined total of the estimated just compensation figures for both parcels. Meanwhile, the Motion for Ex Parte Order sets forth the Government's request for entry of an order vesting immediate possession of the subject property to the Government, without allowing the property owners to be heard ex ante.

II. Analysis

"The United States has the authority to take private property for public use by eminent domain, ... but is obliged by the Fifth Amendment to provide 'just compensation' to the owner thereof." Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United States, 467 U.S. 1, 9, 104 S.Ct. 2187, 81 L.Ed.2d 1 (1984) (citation omitted). Pursuant to the Declaration of Taking Act, the Government may bring an expedited proceeding to acquire land, or an easement in land, for public use by filing a declaration of taking setting forth a statement of authority under which the land is being taken, the public use for which the land is being taken, a description of the land, the estate or interest in the land being taken, a plan showing the land being taken, and an estimate of the just compensation amount. See 40 U.S.C. § 3114(a). Upon the Government's filing of the declaration of taking and depositing the estimated compensation amount in the court registry, the following events occur by operation of law: "(1) title to the estate or interest specified in the declaration vests in the Government; (2) the land is condemned and taken for the use of the Government; and (3) the right to just compensation for the land vests in the persons entitled to the compensation." 40 U.S.C. § 3114(b); see also East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Sage, 361 F.3d 808, 825 (4th Cir. 2004) (in a Declaration of Taking Act case, "[t]itle and the right to

Page 3

possession vest in the government immediately upon the filing of a declaration and the requisite deposit"). Significantly, however, "[w]hile the DTA gives the government the right of immediate possession, the time and terms of possession are fixed by the district court. ... The precise compensation figure is determined later." East Tennessee, 361 F.3d at 821 (citation omitted).

The Supreme Court has recognized that the purpose of the Declaration of Taking Act is "to give the Government immediate possession of the property," while simultaneously providing the former owner "immediate cash compensation to the extent of the Government's estimate of the value of the property." United States...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT