United States v. Abrams
Decision Date | 04 March 1912 |
Docket Number | 3,583. |
Citation | 194 F. 82 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. ABRAMS et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Paul A Ewert, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
S. C Fullerton, for appellees.
Before SANBORN and ADAMS, Circuit Judges, and Wm. H. MUNGER District judge.
WM. H MUNGER, District Judge.
One Minnie Redeagle, a member of the Quapaw tribe of Indians was, on the 26th day of September, 1895, given by the United States a certain allotment patent in and to certain lands situated in the county of Ottawa, in the then Indian Territory, now state of Oklahoma, under and pursuant to the provisions of an act of Congress approved March 2, 1895 (28 Stat. 907, c. 188). That act contained the following provision:
Thereafter and on the 27th of March, 1902, said Minnie Redeagle executed and delivered to the defendant A. W. Abrams a mining lease to a portion of the lands so allotted to her for the full term of 10 years from that date. Subsequently, and on the 23d day of May, 1905, said Minnie Redeagle executed and delivered to the Iowa & Oklahoma Mining Company a mining lease for the term of 10 years from that date on the same land embraced in the before-mentioned lease to A. W. Abrams. Afterwards, and on the 26th of September, 1906, Minnie Redeagle executed and delivered to said Iowa & Oklahoma Mining Company another mining lease covering the same land for a term of 10 years from that date. All of said leases were duly filed for record in the office of the register of deeds for said Ottawa county. Afterwards, and on the 21st day of March, 1910, said A. W. Abrams and the Iowa & Oklahoma Mining Company executed and delivered to said Minnie Redeagle a cancellation and surrender of each of the three before-mentioned...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hallam v. Commerce Mining & Royalty Co., 288.
...from its date. This lease did not violate any of the restrictions imposed by Congress. United States v. Abrams (C. C.) 181 F. 847; Id. (C. C. A. 8) 194 F. 82. On September 28, 1912, Anna Beaver executed to Wills a mining lease on her allotment for a term of ten years from its date. The Comm......
-
Stray Calf v. Scott Land & Livestock Co., 75-1946
...and that the instruments attempting to lease what was only a reversionary interest were void. The lessees rely upon United States v. Abrams, 194 F. 82 (8th Cir. 1912), where the court held valid, under the same statute construed in Noble, an outright cancellation of an existing mining lease......
-
STRAY CALF v. SCOTT LAND & LIVESTOCK COMPANY
...by permitting negotiation of new lease provisions more favorable than those contained in the existing leases. U. S. v. Abrams, 194 F. 82, 83-4 (8th Cir., 1912) emphasized that the Indian allottee must be free to make a new lease to such "party or parties as the allottee might see fit" withi......
-
United States v. Labbitt
...Court cannot approve construction of the statute permitting such a result. Defendant cites the following language in United States v. Abrams, 194 F. 82, 83-84 (C.A.8, 1912): "Minnie Redeagle, upon receiving her allotment was a citizen of the United States, and authorized to contract with re......